Feeds

Wham SAN, thank you ma'am: Adapter biz smacks biggest rival

Emulex outsells QLogic

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

After Emulex's long, arduous revenues climb, and the simultaneous droop in fortunes of QLogic, it seems it has finally caught up to its high-flying SAN adapter competitor - and if current trends continue, it could even hang on to the top spot. That is, if QLogic's new Rainier product doesn't give it the bounce it needs to prevent it from getting left behind.

The two dominating twins in the SAN adapter market had revenues just $1.4m apart and in Emulex's favour three months ago. Now the gap is $2.7m and the chart shows the twin trends of QLogic revenue decline and Emulex revenue growth, relatively speaking, are holding steady.

Emulex QLogic revenue chart

QLogic's latest quarterly results showed revenues of $119.4m and net income of $13.24m. Emulex has just announced its equivalent results and they feature $122.1m revenues number and a $5.6m profit.

The revenue comparison chart, normalised to QLogic quarters and financial years, shows Emulex widening the revenue gap between itself and QLogic - a gap which opened up last quarter.

A profits comparison throws up a different picture; overall Emulex is a profits disaster while QLogic pumps out a profit regularly. But the chart below shows that the gap between the two is tending to narrow as well, with the QLogic line trending down, and the Emulex line trending up. QLogic benefited from a huge profits spike when it sold its InfiniBand business to Intel. Emulex has been hampered by the legal costs of the Broadcom IP dispute and associated penalties but, even so, it is climbing out of the swamps and has reached dry land and profitability, which should continue, especially if its revenues keep climbing.

QLogic Emulex net income trends

Emulex has a stronger Ethernet business than QLogic and its Endace acquisition could boost its revenues - that's what's intended, obviously. But will Endace bring in revenues faster than QLogic's Rainier flash-enhanced adapters? Will Emulex survive unchanged after activist investor Elliott Management's aggressive visit to its ranks of stockholders? Interesting questions and there's no answer except to wait for time to pass. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.