Feeds

AT&T 'violates net neutrality' by NOT charging twice for same data

FCC should probe femto financials foul-up - digital rights group

3 Big data security analytics techniques

American telco giant AT&T doesn’t want to charge femtocell users twice for the same data, but exempting its customers from the second bill could fall foul of US Network Neutrality, says the Public Knowledge blog, which has demanded an FCC investigation into "data cap abuse".

Femtocells are tiny base stations which route cellular connections over domestic broadband to extend coverage, but that generally results in customers paying twice for the data: once to their cellular network and once to their broadband provider, so AT&T decided that customers buying both services from AT&T should only be charged once, which is where Net Neutrality kicks in.

The problem is that if you have a femtocell from Verizon or Sprint then you do have to pay twice for the bandwidth, and that's not neutral - which is why Public Knowledge is calling for an FCC investigation.

It's not that customers actually pay for the bandwidth directly, it's just deducted from your monthly cap or not, which is effectively the same as paying for it. This means data used by an AT&T femtocell on AT&T's U-Verse broadband is only deducted from the cellular cap and not from the fixed-line cap, as would normally be the case.

Back when femtocells were first proposed it was assumed that punters would refuse to pay twice, and that, combined with quality of service issues, would limit deployments to customers who got their fixed and mobile from the same supplier. But cheap broadband made customers less sensitive, while increased capacity made quality-of-service issues disappear, to the point where femtocell users pay so little they don't mind paying twice.

But the amount of money isn't relevant to Net Neutrality, which requires packets to be treated equally and is a matter of principle, and - at least in the USA - a matter of law, as Public Knowledge points out. ®

Top three mobile application threats

More from The Register

next story
Virgin Media so, so SORRY for turning spam fire-hose on its punters
Hundreds of emails flood inboxes thanks to gaffe
A black box for your SUITCASE: Now your lost luggage can phone home – quite literally
Breakfast in London, lunch in NYC, and your clothes in Peru
AT&T threatens to pull out of FCC wireless auctions over purchase limits
Company wants ability to buy more spectrum space in auction
Turnbull leaves Australia's broadband blackspots in the dark
New Statement of Expectations to NBN Co offers get-out clauses for blackspot builds
Facebook claims 100 MEEELLION active users in India
Who needs China when you've got the next billion in your sights?
Facebook splats in-app chat, whacks brats into crack yakety-yak app
Jibber-jabbering addicts turfed out just as Zuck warned
Google looks to LTE and Wi-Fi to help it lube YouTube tubes
Bandwidth hogger needs tube embiggenment if it's to succeed
prev story

Whitepapers

SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.