The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Black holes bigger than first thought

Boffins ready to ditch linear galaxy size = black hole size assumption

Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime

A bit of “astronomical shorthand” applied to make galactic mathematics easier to deal with might have to be abandoned, according to researchers from Swinburne University.

According to Professor Alister Graham from Swinburne’s Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, the decade-old assumption that black holes account for a fixed fraction of galactic mass is incorrect.

The usual assumption was that black holes grew bigger in step with the growth of the galaxy. Instead, the Swinburne research suggests that the assumed linear relationship between galaxy size and black hole size is much more complex.

“We now know that each ten-fold increase of a galaxy's stellar mass is associated with a much larger 100-fold increase in its black hole mass,” Professor Graham states in this university announcement. “This has widespread implications for our understanding of galaxy and black hole coevolution.”

The bigger the black hole, the hungrier. Image: Gabriel Perez Diaz

In smaller galaxies, he notes, “the star clusters, which can contain up to millions of stars, really dominate over the black holes.”

The analysis also suggests that there should be a large number of intermediate-mass black holes out there, waiting to be discovered. With a mass between that of a single star and a million stars, intermediate black holes have been hard to find.

Professor Graham says they may lie within galaxies already known to harbor one black hole, and should be detectable by the new generation of extremely large telescopes.

His group combined observations from Hubble, Europe’s Very Large Telescope in Chile, and the Keck Telescope in Hawaii. They analysed 77 galaxies and their central black holes, calculating the mass of the black hole based on the orbital speed of nearby stars. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Re: I wonder

From what I read in the full article, not really. It's more like that the total mass of a galaxy stays the same, but the ratio of distribution of mass is skewed towards the central black hole compared to the visible stuff as the galaxy grows larger.

3
0

I wonder

whether this has implications for the calculated distribution of dark matter?

3
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: I wonder

I believe the relationship is (or should be) with the age of the galaxy, not specifically it's size, thus...

the ratio of distribution of mass is skewed towards the central black hole compared to the visible stuff as the galaxy grows <b>older</b> - my emphasis.

0
0

More from The Register

New material enables 1,000-meter super-skyscrapers
Before you read on, see if you can guess how the new stuff will be used
 breaking news
You've seen the Large Hadron Collider. Now comes the HUGE Hadron Collider
International Linear Collider ready to rock and roll
 breaking news
Latest NASA ASTRONAUT class is HALF FEMALE
Newbie 'nauts include lady Marine fighter pilot, male doctor
Boffins find evidence Atlantic Ocean has started closing
'Embryonic subduction zone' that flattened Lisbon headed for Blighty
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
Headbangers have a gas, gas, gas in mosh pits
Boffins say heavy metal crowds behave like The Vapours
Hubble spies unlikely planet being born in hostile neighborhood
Hoovering a cloud of sand 7.5 billion miles from a tiny star
 breaking news
Jaguar to open new car-making factory in Blighty (virtually)
Britain still makes stuff, it's just not real any more...
 breaking news
Spin doctors brazenly fiddle with tiny bits in front of the neighbours
Quantum computer address bus just nanometres wide
 breaking news
China's second woman 'naut blasts off for coupling in HEAVEN
Wang and pals test the cosmic waters for Chinese space station