Swartz prosecutor: We only pushed for 'six months' in the cooler
'There is little I can say to abate the anger', says Ortiz
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
US attorney Carmen Ortiz, who led the fraud case against Aaron Swartz until his suicide last week, has defended her prosecution of the internet prodigy.
Swartz, 26, took his life on Friday at his home in New York in the midst of a lengthy court battle that could have put him behind bars for decades. He was charged with computer fraud after copying 4.8 million scientific articles from the nonprofit journal archive JSTOR to allegedly redistribute online.
According to his defence lawyers, the Reddit co-founder killed himself shortly after learning that the prosecution would not consider a plea bargain that would rule out a jail sentence.
Within days of his death, an online petition was created urging President Obama to fire Ortiz after Swartz's family said their son's suicide was "the product of a criminal justice system rife with intimidation and prosecutorial overreach". The web appeal, hosted by the White House website, has collected at least 40,000 signatures.
Today, Ortiz, the US attorney for the district of Massachusetts, said her "office's conduct was appropriate in bringing and handling this case". She claimed that her team had not pushed for an unduly severe punishment.
"At no time did this office ever seek – or ever tell Mr Swartz’s attorneys that it intended to seek – maximum penalties under the law," she said in a statement.
"The prosecutors recognised that there was no evidence against Mr Swartz indicating that he committed his acts for personal financial gain, and they recognised that his conduct – while a violation of the law – did not warrant the severe punishments authorised by Congress and called for by the Sentencing Guidelines in appropriate cases.
"That is why in the discussions with his counsel about a resolution of the case this office sought an appropriate sentence that matched the alleged conduct – a sentence that we would recommend to the judge of six months in a low-security setting.
"While at the same time, his defence counsel would have been free to recommend a sentence of probation. Ultimately, any sentence imposed would have been up to the judge."
Swartz faced 13 felony charges including counts of wire fraud, computer fraud and recklessly damaging a protected computer, which could cumulatively carry a sentence of more than 30 years.
The federal attorney's statement, the first time she's been drawn to comment on Swartz's death, also offered her sympathies to his family and friends.
"I know that there is little I can say to abate the anger felt by those who believe that this office’s prosecution of Mr Swartz was unwarranted and somehow led to the tragic result of him taking his own life," she said. ®
COMMENTS
Re: Prosecutor not to blame
"...how this actually works" *is* the problem. US-Style plea bargaining (as implemented) is an sometimes-evil system that would force even the innocent to plead guilty.
Or, in this case, force the accused of what should be a misdemeanor to choose between 1) being a felon with a 6-month sentence, 2) being a felon with perhaps a decades-long sentence and bankrupted, or 3) suicide. Option 4 would have been a violent rampage.
Re: Criminals doing criminal things get criminal charges? ABSURD!
I believe that most people are more disappointed at the apparent 2-tier justice system (UK and US).
We have international bankers, dealers, executives, all commiting massive financial crimes or safety negligence and they are never held liable. Perhaps a fine to the corporation, paid by shareholders/insurance/etc but never a suit in jail.
Yet the small fish, yes have broken laws, are prosecuted/hounded to the maximum. Extradited from countries where they have commited no offense. Arrested in illegal dawn raids, etc.
Its time for a 'fair' justice system. Either prosecute the executives in the same way as the rest of us, or the rest of us in the same way as the executives.
Psychological extortion
Plea bargain is basically a form of (psychological) extortion. You just talk up the penalty and see what happens. The plea bargain system is corrupt in favor of the prosecution.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
