The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

EU launches formal Microsoft privacy policy probe

Wants proof that Redmond's terms are better than Google's

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

The European Union has opened a formal investigation into whether recent changes to Microsoft's Services Agreement are in violation of EU data privacy law.

Privacy regulators informed the software giant of the probe in a letter sent to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and the head of the company's Luxembourg division, dated December 17, Bloomberg reports.

"Given the wide range of services you offer, and popularity of these services, changes in your Services Agreement and the linked Privacy Policy may affect many individuals in most or all of the EU member states," Jacob Kohnstamm, head of the privacy watchdog Article 29 Working Party, wrote in the brief letter.

The tweaks to Microsoft's terms of service took effect on October 19 and were met with surprisingly little furor at the time, considering that they were substantially similar to the earlier policy changes that swiftly landed Google in hot water with regulators on both sides of the Atlantic.

The revised Microsoft Services Agreement here seems to take a fairly broad view of what Redmond can do with the data stored on its servers:

When you upload your content to the services, you agree that it may be used, modified, adapted, saved, reproduced, distributed, and displayed to the extent necessary to protect you and to provide, protect and improve Microsoft products and services.

The older wording said Microsoft could make use of the data "solely to the extent necessary to provide the service." It's a subtle distinction, perhaps – and in fact, one that Microsoft claims doesn't exist at all.

"We're happy to answer any questions officials may have about recent changes to the Microsoft Services Agreement, which we've said previously do not alter our privacy policies," a Redmond rep told The Reg in an emailed statement.

Those comments echo what the company has been saying since October, when spokesman Jack Evans also said the "update" to the Services Agreement "did not alter" existing policies.

"Over the years, we have consistently informed users that we may use their content to improve the services they receive," Evans told The New York Times, citing spam filters and automated email categorization as two examples of features for which Microsoft analyzes content.

"One thing we don't do is use the content of our customers' private communications and documents to create targeted advertising," Evans said. "If that ever changes, we'll be the first to let our customers know."

But those reassurances don't seem to have convinced EU regulators, who have been examining the situation since shortly after the new terms took effect, seemingly with growing concern.

In October, Gerard Lommel, president of Luxembourg's data protection commission told Bloomberg, "This investigation is not at the same level as the probe concerning Google was a few months ago when it changed its privacy policy, where clear privacy issues had been identified."

Regulators led by Luxembourg and France now seem to have altered their stance somewhat, having informed Microsoft that they have "decided to check the possible consequences for the protection of the personal data of these individuals in a coordinated procedure."

No time frame for the probe has been given.

Of course, such an investigation does not in and of itself imply that the EU will take any further action. But EU regulators have been harshly critical of Google's similarly broad data sharing policy, and in October they issued a letter signed by representatives of 27 countries, demanding that the search giant clarify its terms and provide more opt-out options.

No fines have yet been discussed in that case, however, and regulators have not accused the Chocolate Factory of breaking the law. Google is reportedly mulling its next steps. ®

What you need to know about cloud backup

The subtlety of Microsoft.

"It's a subtle distinction, perhaps – and in fact, one that Microsoft claims doesn't exist at all."

Ummm, if a difference doesn't exist, then why did MSFT need to change it?

Sorry, Mr Ballmer, but I don't buy that line of reasoning. IANAL but there's got to be a sneaky gotcha in there that makes it to Microsoft's advantage.

3
0
Anonymous Coward

Oh goodie...

I hope they tot up the obscene protection money the US government has been extorting from UBS/HSBC/BP/Toyota et al and adds it on to the fine Microsoft get to pay for fucking over the worlds computer users.

3
0

And the rest

With the to-do over orphaned works and the land-grab being made by some to profit off the sweat of others without having to offer them any remunerations; is this any surprise?

By all means use social media; but always tag your pictures and only upload reduced quality. If people think your work is good, get them to come and pay you.

3
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
NSA: We COULD track you by your phone ... if we WANTED to
Honestly, too much work, can't be bothered