Feeds

EU launches formal Microsoft privacy policy probe

Wants proof that Redmond's terms are better than Google's

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

The European Union has opened a formal investigation into whether recent changes to Microsoft's Services Agreement are in violation of EU data privacy law.

Privacy regulators informed the software giant of the probe in a letter sent to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and the head of the company's Luxembourg division, dated December 17, Bloomberg reports.

"Given the wide range of services you offer, and popularity of these services, changes in your Services Agreement and the linked Privacy Policy may affect many individuals in most or all of the EU member states," Jacob Kohnstamm, head of the privacy watchdog Article 29 Working Party, wrote in the brief letter.

The tweaks to Microsoft's terms of service took effect on October 19 and were met with surprisingly little furor at the time, considering that they were substantially similar to the earlier policy changes that swiftly landed Google in hot water with regulators on both sides of the Atlantic.

The revised Microsoft Services Agreement here seems to take a fairly broad view of what Redmond can do with the data stored on its servers:

When you upload your content to the services, you agree that it may be used, modified, adapted, saved, reproduced, distributed, and displayed to the extent necessary to protect you and to provide, protect and improve Microsoft products and services.

The older wording said Microsoft could make use of the data "solely to the extent necessary to provide the service." It's a subtle distinction, perhaps – and in fact, one that Microsoft claims doesn't exist at all.

"We're happy to answer any questions officials may have about recent changes to the Microsoft Services Agreement, which we've said previously do not alter our privacy policies," a Redmond rep told The Reg in an emailed statement.

Those comments echo what the company has been saying since October, when spokesman Jack Evans also said the "update" to the Services Agreement "did not alter" existing policies.

"Over the years, we have consistently informed users that we may use their content to improve the services they receive," Evans told The New York Times, citing spam filters and automated email categorization as two examples of features for which Microsoft analyzes content.

"One thing we don't do is use the content of our customers' private communications and documents to create targeted advertising," Evans said. "If that ever changes, we'll be the first to let our customers know."

But those reassurances don't seem to have convinced EU regulators, who have been examining the situation since shortly after the new terms took effect, seemingly with growing concern.

In October, Gerard Lommel, president of Luxembourg's data protection commission told Bloomberg, "This investigation is not at the same level as the probe concerning Google was a few months ago when it changed its privacy policy, where clear privacy issues had been identified."

Regulators led by Luxembourg and France now seem to have altered their stance somewhat, having informed Microsoft that they have "decided to check the possible consequences for the protection of the personal data of these individuals in a coordinated procedure."

No time frame for the probe has been given.

Of course, such an investigation does not in and of itself imply that the EU will take any further action. But EU regulators have been harshly critical of Google's similarly broad data sharing policy, and in October they issued a letter signed by representatives of 27 countries, demanding that the search giant clarify its terms and provide more opt-out options.

No fines have yet been discussed in that case, however, and regulators have not accused the Chocolate Factory of breaking the law. Google is reportedly mulling its next steps. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Hello, police, El Reg here. Are we a bunch of terrorists now?
Do Brits risk arrest for watching beheading video nasty? We asked the fuzz
UK fuzz want PINCODES on ALL mobile phones
Met Police calls for mandatory passwords on all new mobes
Munich considers dumping Linux for ... GULP ... Windows!
Give a penguinista a hug, the Outlook's not good for open source's poster child
EU justice chief blasts Google on 'right to be forgotten'
Don't pretend it's a freedom of speech issue – interim commish
Detroit losing MILLIONS because it buys CHEAP BATTERIES – report
Man at hardware store was right: name brands DO last longer
Snowden on NSA's MonsterMind TERROR: It may trigger cyberwar
Plus: Syria's internet going down? That was a US cock-up
UK government accused of hiding TRUTH about Universal Credit fiasco
'Reset rating keeps secrets on one-dole-to-rule-them-all plan', say MPs
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
e-Borders fiasco: Brits stung for £224m after US IT giant sues UK govt
Defeat to Raytheon branded 'catastrophic result'
Yes, but what are your plans if a DRAGON attacks?
Local UK gov outs most ridiculous FoI requests...
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.