Feeds

Worldwide Gmail crash was due to Google Sync bug

Engineer: How Oompah-Loompah config foul-up pulled down world's email

Protecting against web application threats using SSL

It was a Googler misconfiguring a sync server that took out Chrome and Gmail on Monday, an engineer has stated on dev forums.

The reason for Gmail's brief burnout on Monday has been winkled out, and it was connected to the rolling crashes suffered on the Chrome browser on the same day.

It was a human error in configuring a Chrome component that throttled traffic in Chrome and then on several other Google services, explained Chrome engineer Tim Steele in a post on the Google code forum.

The component controlled traffic for Chrome Sync - a service that allows users to synchronise their customised Chrome browser across all of their devices, giving them the same bookmarks, widgets, settings and browsing history.

A small change to its configuration settings meant the load-balancing component started to throttle traffic when it wasn't supposed to. And because the component is core to the infrastructure that many Google services depend on, it affected them too.

It was Chrome Sync users who were hit by the outage first.

Steele explained:

- Chrome Sync Server relies on a backend infrastructure component to enforce quotas on per-datatype sync traffic.
- That quota service experienced traffic problems today due to a faulty load balancing configuration change.
- That change was to a core piece of infrastructure that many services at Google depend on. This means other services may have been affected at the same time, leading to the confounding original title [the Gmail bug] of this bug.
- Because of the quota service failure, Chrome Sync servers reacted too conservatively by telling clients to throttle "all" data types, without accounting for the fact that not all client versions support all data types.

The crash is due to faulty logic responsible for handling "throttled" data types on the client when the data types are unrecognized.

There is WRONG in the cloud. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Wanna keep your data for 1,000 YEARS? No? Hard luck, HDS wants you to anyway
Combine Blu-ray and M-DISC and you get this monster
US boffins demo 'twisted radio' mux
OAM takes wireless signals to 32 Gbps
Google+ GOING, GOING ... ? Newbie Gmailers no longer forced into mandatory ID slurp
Mountain View distances itself from lame 'network thingy'
Apple flops out 2FA for iCloud in bid to stop future nude selfie leaks
Millions of 4chan users howl with laughter as Cupertino slams stable door
Students playing with impressive racks? Yes, it's cluster comp time
The most comprehensive coverage the world has ever seen. Ever
Run little spreadsheet, run! IBM's Watson is coming to gobble you up
Big Blue's big super's big appetite for big data in big clouds for big analytics
Seagate's triple-headed Cerberus could SAVE the DISK WORLD
... and possibly bring us even more HAMR time. Yay!
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.