The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

New transistor tech could beat silicon and save Moore's Law

Indium gallium arsenide tapped for smaller, faster chips

IEDM Boffins at MIT's Microsystems Technology Laboratories have developed the world's smallest transistor made of indium gallium arsenide, a substance they say could replace silicon as the go-to material for building tomorrow's ultra-fast, ultra-small microchips.

The tiny transistor is just 22nm in length, according to a report by MIT's in-house news agency, but it offers good logic performance.

That may not sound so impressive on first take, considering that Intel already uses a 22nm process to fabricate its newest-generation Core processors, with 14nm on the way.

But etching transistors much smaller than that using today's silicon-wafer processes will be tricky, because the smaller the transistors get, more difficult it is for them to handle current efficiently. Researchers believe we are fast approaching a "brick wall," after which point shrinking silicon transistors any further will be infeasible.

It should come as no surprise, then, that chip boffins have been searching high and low for practical alternatives to silicon. Graphene, gallium nitride, molybdenite, even carbon nanotubes – they're trying everything.

Indium gallium arsenide has long been a promising candidate, however, because its ability to conduct electrons is superior to silicon's at the nanometer scale – about five times better, in fact.

The material is already widely used in fiber-optic applications and in radar systems. The trick, however, has been figuring out how to create transistors with it that are small enough to be usable in microprocessors.

Jesús del Alamo and his team at MIT's Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science think they have found that method.

First, they used molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) to grow a thin layer of indium gallium arsenide. They then used a combination of electron beam lithography and a technique whereby evaporated molybdenum is fired at the wafer to create the three electrodes that make up the transistor: the gate, the source, and the drain.

Del Alamo says that although none of these techniques is really novel in the semiconductor industry, their use with non-silicon compounds has not been explored much so far, mainly because traditional applications of indium gallium arsenide don't require the tiny components that microchips call for.

"But when you are talking about integrating billions of tiny transistors onto a chip, then we need to completely reformulate the fabrication technology of compound semiconductor transistors to look much more like that of silicon transistors," he says.

According to del Alamo, the group's next step will be to try to shrink the size of the transistors it can produce even smaller than 22nm, with the ultimate goal of reducing them to below 10nm.

Should they succeed, however, there's still one hitch to overcome before chips based on the new material go mainstream; namely, that indium gallium arsenide – which is composed of the elements indium, gallium, and arsenic – is currently as much as 10 times as expensive as the equivalent amount of silicon. Those chips may be small, all right. But they'll cost you.

Del Alamo and his group will present their findings at the International Electron Devices Meeting, taking place this week in San Francisco. ®

Anonymous Coward

Alternatively...

Maybe we can stop the software bloat and develop better mainstream languages/compilers to make good use of the chips we can actually make cheaply?

I mean, WFT is a web browser doing these days needing GB of RAM just to run?! Is it really doing so much more than the browsers _and_ OS of a decade ago that were usable in 64MB and a 200MHz CPU?

10
1

We have enough power

We just need to learn to use it properly.

From what I've seen, the vast majority of code is bloated and lazy, with people lifting libraries from other programs and 'tweaking' them.

If you could make a program that had the coding efficiencies of Elite with modern equipment, I don't think we would need to worry about the power of our computers.

Unless you are running the latest 3D games and triple 24" 1600*1200 screens and absolutely won't accept anything less than 60fps then I think we could get by with what we have*.

*I realize this is, of course, blasphemy. I expect to be punished.

8
0

Re: May I be the first to say....

For I do not come to destroy Moore's Law, but to fulfil it.

4
0

Re: Alternatively...

re: mhz wars...

Humans lost this years ago (we run at around 15hz*, but damn, we still parrallel process *way* better than silicon**. So hz/mhz isn't really that important.

* though it is possible to run an entire Country on as low as 1-2hz...see "George Bush".

** parrallel processing is not number crunching. See "financial crisis 2008" for evidence of that.

5
1

NPN transistor?

NPN devices don't have a Gate, Drain and Source. Could have at least used a FET symbol, or described the transistor as having a Base, Collector and Emitter.

Just saying...

4
0

More from The Register

Microsoft reveals Xbox One, the console that can read your heartbeat
Upgrades Live service – and no always-on requirement
MYSTERY Nokia Lumia with gazillion-pixel camera 'spotted'
With 20Mp sensor - NOW will you try Windows Phone 8?
 breaking news
The iWatch is coming! The iWatch is coming!
Reports: Apple's wrister to have 1.5-inch OLED, test units being built
Review: Sony Xperia SP
The new mid-range marvel? Oh yes.
US boffin builds 32-way Raspberry Pi cluster
Beowulf cluster built for the price of a single PC
Dell's PC-on-a-stick landing in July: report
Wyse up, suckers, could this be a new set-side-stick?
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner