Feeds

Facebook T&Cs vote falls 299.5 million short of quorum

Brief experiment in social democracy snuffed

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Facebook's three-year experiment with user democracy now looks doomed, with a vote over the social network's new terms and conditions coming just under 299,500,000 votes short of the total needed to block the changes.

The proposed changes will eliminate the current user voting system, which was established in 2009 as a token gesture to those annoyed at Facebook's high-handed attitude to T&C changes, in addition to allowing greater data sharing with affiliates like Instagram.

After a week of voting, 589,141 users went against the changes, with just 79,731 in favor.

Facebook has said it would recognize the votes as binding only if a third of the total user base – currently around a billion profiles, a fair few of which are fake – actually votes, so this is well short of the quorum needed to block the move. The final decision on the changes now rests with Facebook's management.

Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) told El Reg that the vote, while not binding, should still make Facebook's management stop and think.

The turnout makes it the largest vote in Facebook's history – over double that of the last vote in June – and nearly 90 per cent of those who cast their ballot were opposed to the new changes, he said.

Facebook terms change vote

This is how democracy dies

"EPIC's view is that the Facebook users who participated in the vote made clear that Facebook should withdraw the proposed changes," Rotenberg said.

Under the scheme put forward by Facebook, user issues will now be addressed in a regular webcast by its chief privacy officer, Erin Egan. User issues to be discussed will be chosen at Facebook's discretion, but the company has said it is also planning to introduce new user feedback tools to replace direct voting.

"While Facebook says it plans to 'incorporate suggestions into creating new tools that enhance communication on Facebook about privacy and governance,' Facebook consistently dodges specifics and continues to push for an end to the democratic, user-based voting process," said Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman, executive director of SumOfUs.org, in an emailed statement.

"The current system requires a ridiculous 1/3 of all Facebook users to vote, an implausible number that is so hard to reach that it has no practical impact on Facebook's decision-making. Even so, Mark Zuckerberg isn't content with his near-dictatorial powers over users, and is trying to get rid of even this most token gesture towards democracy." ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.