TVShack's Richard O'Dwyer sent home with £20,000 fine
Extradition swerved
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Richard O'Dwyer, the Briton who ran one of the world's most popular download links websites, must cough up £20,000 after avoiding extradition in a bargain with US authorities.
The GP's son will pay the sum under a "deferred prosecution agreement". He voluntarily flew out to New York from Blighty for his court hearing yesterday.
Prosecutors claimed O'Dwyer, now a student, earned $230,000 (£143k) from the TVShack website.
O'Dwyer set up TVShack.net in 2007, and provided links to video streams and online storage lockers at websites including DivxDen.com, NovaMov.com and VideoWeed.com. He encouraged users to contribute material, with a how-to guide, advising that “only full movies and full TV episodes are accepted”. No actual copyrighted content was hosted by his website.
After the TVShack domain was seized by the US authorities in June 2010, O'Dwyer set up again at TVShack.cc and carried on: the new site featured a photograph of NWA's Fuck the Police. He was arrested by City of London Police in November 2010 and the United States' extradition request to prosecute him stateside was granted in January this year.
O'Dwyer's supporters maintain he broke no UK criminal law.
For the UK to agree to extradition, a person must be accused of "an offence under the law of the relevant part of the United Kingdom punishable with imprisonment for a term of 12 months or a greater punishment”.
O'Dwyer told The Guardian newspaper, which campaigned on his behalf, that he had not done anything wrong. ®
COMMENTS
Re: Who says crime doesn't pay?
What crime?
He hosted a website that provided links. He did not host nor share any material himself, even the prosecution admitted that. If you can prosecute someone for providing links on a webpage then you should prosecute those who do it on a massive scale - Google, Bing, Yahoo, altavista etc
Hmmm.... I though the crux of his defence
Was that he complied with the relevant legal take-down orders. That aspect of the case seems to have disappeared from the news. Either way, to stick his head into the jaws of the tiger and come out with a £20000 fine, he's got off lightly.
I'd hazard that starting up an ad paid linking service at the moment might be a bad idea (unless you''re Google).
Re: Who says crime doesn't pay?
What crime did he commit?
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM Implementer’s Checklist
