Feeds

Hurricane Sandy blows US pirate-pestering plan into 2013

Dear Cutlass Bob, please stop stealing all our stuff

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The voluntary US copyright scheme designed to head off anti-piracy legislation has been delayed again - this time, because of Hurricane Sandy. The Center for Copyright Information (CCI) says alerts won't now be sent out to serial infringers until early 2013.

"Due to unexpected factors largely stemming from Hurricane Sandy which have seriously affected our final testing schedules, CCI anticipates that the participating ISPs will begin sending alerts under the Copyright Alert System in the early part of 2013, rather than by the end of the year," the body said in a statement.

CCI is a body set up with the five biggest US ISPs and the creative industries to tackle online piracy. Under the scheme, copyright industries must make the complaints but they don't get to find out who the infringer is - a compromise intended to preserve users' privacy. They still need a court order to obtain an infringer's identity. ISPs aren't allowed to cut subscribers off from "essential services" such as email - but can slow down the connections of persistent infringers.

It's not what either side ideally wants, but it might be the best they get. ISPs fend off new legislation and get to preserve their safe harbour liabilities - while copyright industries hope to get serial pirates to change their behaviour.

A similar agreement was reached between British ISPs and copyright industries in the UK in 2008 - which envisaged educational letters going out to serial infringers. But trust broke down, and legislation was introduced in 2010.

"I'm still wrestling philosophically with how to engage with and sell to people you've disconnected in the first place. You need to provide them with the music they want, on a platform they want, at a price they want," former Undertone Feargal Sharkey said at the time.

Warning! Black Helicopters

Ofcom confirmed last week that it doesn't expect letters to go out to UK internet subscribers until 2014.

An FAQ on the US scheme can be found here. But if you're a blogger, feel free to ignore this: just close your eyes and imagine black helicopters swooping from the skies. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.