Feeds

How to launch people into space...

...if you want them to survive the journey

High performance access to file storage

It's Not Rocket Science Last time, I explored how difficult it is for computer hardware to operate in the noisy - from an electromagnetic radiation perspective - environment of outer space. Today’s topic is people. Don’t worry, I won’t be boring you with life support systems. That’s the least of a spacer’s worries. Before you need to worry about keeping your astronaut breathing, you’ve got to get them into orbit first, in a condition where the oxygen will still be required.

The US military has a long history of spinning people in circles for fun to find out just how tolerant they are to G-forces. There have also been some rather more gruesome tests performed by certain less-than-ethical nations in the earlier half of the 20th Century. The result of all this is a good understanding of exactly when you need to worry about your lungs collapsing or needing to press your eyeballs back into their sockets.

G-forces are simply acceleration induced by the Earth’s gravity under freefall, and there are three types that need to be dealt with:

  • Linear acceleration Moving in a straight line - you knew this one already
  • Radial acceleration Traveling around the perimeter of a circle
  • Angular acceleration Rotating around an axis passing through the body

Although all three of these can be encountered in a space mission, radial and angular can be controlled under normal operating conditions and are only experienced in anomalous events. Linear G, however, is unavoidable if you want to get off the ground at all.

Nasa's g-force centrifuge

Nasa's g-force centrifuge: survive a spin in this and you can go into space... maybe
Source: NASA

As you know, linear accelerations are encountered every day, but only rarely will you experience greater than 1g for any non-impulsive event. In a spacecraft, however, linear accelerations greater than 1g can be experienced for extended durations during launch, abort, re-entry and landing. Landing can involved coming home or arriving somewhere more interesting, but I’ll deal with settling down on planets with a gravity greater than 1g another time.

Unlike a cargo payload, the human body doesn’t react uniformly to G-loading, so an XYZ coordinate system must be defined. The Gz axis runs vertically through the upright body, with +Gz acting downwards to compress the spine. Gx acts perpendicular to the chest with +Gx compressing the lungs. Gy acts sideways into the limbs.

The effects of G-loading are primarily caused by cardiovascular pressure changes, these are most dramatic when accelerating the body in the Z axis. Under positive Gz the subject will experience difficulty moving against 2g. At 3g lifting arms and legs is almost impossible and vision begins to blur. At 4g you can’t move at all. Beyond 5g, you’ll black out after five seconds, and longer exposure results in what space scientists call "G-LOC": G-induced loss of consciousness. The astronaut’s blood pressure is insufficient to combat the acceleration and reach the brain, thus starving the higher centres of oxygen.

Under -Gz, the opposite occurs and by 2g subjects report throbbing headaches due to excessive blood pressure in the skull and redout at 3g as the conjunctiva is forced over the eyeball. Testing beyond 4g is almost intolerable beyond six seconds and G-LOC occurs rapidly.

Gx is a much more pleasant sensation than Gz, but that’s not to say it’s all fun and rollercoasters. That being said, if you’ve been on Stealth at Thorpe Park, then you’ll have an idea of what +4.5Gx feels like - at least momentarily.

In a more extreme case, humans can tolerate +2Gx for 24 hours with slight abdominal pressure. When you get up to 3g though, there is measurable compression of the chest with breathing and speaking difficulties. Around 6g heartbeats start to become irregular and at 8g limbs can’t be lifted. Above 12g breathing is nigh on impossible and is accompanied by extreme chest pains and loss of vision. However, G-LOC is uncommon.

-Gx results in similar effects, but without chest compression or breathing difficulties.

Little research has been done on ±Gy, but it is known that around ±5g hemorrhages occur in the arms and legs.

Nasa's Apollo g-force launch profile

Saw-tooth graph for a sore arse
Source: Nasa

While a cargo payload - satellite, space probe, Mars rover, nuclear hovertank with laser canon - may be able to withstand 30g or more during a launch, it’s clear that people can’t - at least if you want them to do science or zap aliens when they’re up there.

As a result, rockets carrying humans tend to have relatively low thrust-to-weight ratios to ensure minimal g-loads. For example, the Mercury, Atlas and Gemini missions put the likes of Shepard, Glen and Grissom through g-loads 6.4g for 54 seconds and 6g for 35 seconds, while folks going up on Apollo and Skylab trips experienced only around 4g for similar time periods.

To end up on a lunar bound coasting trajectory, Apollo astronauts were subjected to three different levels of acceleration, one for each stage of the Saturn V. The first of these accelerated from 1g to 4.5g over the course of 150 seconds. Next, the second stage shunt was kept at to 1.8g for 300 seconds to limit maximum dynamic pressure. The third stage has a bit more of a kick and shoved along at between 1.2g and 2.6g for the last 130 seconds.

Despite the minimised acceleration, this still isn’t tolerable to humans sitting vertically, so every single human space launch that has ever occurred has had astronauts lounging back at a leisurely angle of about 12 degrees from horizontal.

Nasa's astronaut angle chart

Sit back, you'll be more comfortable...
Source: NASA

By ensuring that their seatbacks are reclined for take off, it’s possible for trained astronauts to tolerate forces in excess of 10g for a few minutes.

So sit back and relax.... it’s the only way to stay alive if you want to get up there.

Getting back, though - that’s a whole other debacle... ®

Further Reading

Want to know more? Check out these two items:

  • Kumar, K. Norfleet, W (1992) Issues on Human Acceleration Tolerance After Long-Duration Space Flights. Available from NASA
  • Rollercoaster Database (2012) Stealth - Thorpe Park. Available online

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Elon Musk's LEAKY THRUSTER gas stalls Space Station supply run
Helium seeps from Falcon 9 first stage, delays new legs for NASA robonaut
Solar-powered aircraft unveiled for round-the-world flight
It's going to be a slow and sleepy flight for the pilots
Russian deputy PM: 'We are coming to the Moon FOREVER'
Plans to annex Earth's satellite with permanent base by 2030
KILLER SPONGES menacing California coastline
Surfers are safe, crustaceans less so
LOHAN's Punch and Judy show relaunches Thursday
Weather looking good for second pop at test flights
New FEMTO-MOON sighted BIRTHING from Saturn's RING
Icy 'Peggy' looks to be leaving the outer rings
Discovery time for 200m WONDER MATERIALS shaved from 4 MILLENNIA... to 4 years
Alloy, Alloy: Boffins in speed-classification breakthrough
Curiosity finds not-very-Australian-shaped rock on Mars
File under 'messianic pastries' and move on, people
Top Secret US payload launched into space successfully
Clandestine NRO spacecraft sets off on its unknown mission
prev story

Whitepapers

Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
HP ArcSight ESM solution helps Finansbank
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.