Feeds

Claimed $400m Google buyout is fake, ICOA boss warns

SEC called after hoax press release sends shares spiking

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

It was a lousy start to the post-Thanksgiving weekend for the management of US hotspot provider ICOA after the company fell victim to what looks like a classic pump-and-dump stock scam.

On Monday morning a press release was posted on PRweb announcing that Google was splashing out $400m to buy the firm, which operates 1,500 Wi-Fi hotspots across the US, including in high-value areas such as marinas and universities.

The story caused heavy trading in the firm's shares, but CFO Erwin Vahlsinghas confirmed to The Register that the story isn't true.

"It's a false release," he told us. "The SEC has been notified."

ICOA is firmly in the penny share category, with shares trading on the OTC Pink sheets for fractions of a cent. Nevertheless, the press release more than quadrupled the share price, and at its peak over 500 million shares were traded, indicating that someone made off with at least $200,000 in profit.

That the badly spelled two-paragraph press release announcing the deal caused such a flutter can't just be blamed on minds being slowed by the nation's turkey coma. The acquisition does make a certain amount of sense, given that Google has been active in expanding internet access and ICOA has been talking about buy-out negotiations for a while now.

ICOA stock price bump

Buy, buy, buy! No sell, sell, sell!

The case also shows the difference in economics that the internet has made to this kind of scam. When pumping and dumping shares was first tried out, it was a risky and expensive business – there were phone banks of people to hire to sell the stock, who needed housing and paying off. Nowadays all you need is a press release and a few million spam emails, and twitchy stock traders will do the rest.

Google isn't saying anything on the matter so far, but sources in the company confirmed the deal wasn't on and ICOA wasn't even on its radar. Whether the SEC investigation yields any culprits remains to be seen. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.