The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Microsoft's Surface bait-and-switch won't make people buy Windows 8

We want a total package, not just an OS

Cloud based data management

Open... and Shut Microsoft had better hope departing board member Reed Hastings is wrong about Windows.

In some parting comments to a group of Dow Jones reporters, Hastings called Microsoft's Surface tablet a "tactic to spur people on, to get Windows 8 really successful." In other words, according to Hastings, Surface is just a means to get people to forget the future and instead throw money into Microsoft's successful business model of the past.

It's not going to happen.

With Surface, Microsoft broke new ground, assuming the risk of antagonising its hardware partners to demonstrate an Apple-esque, end-to-end mobile experience. Now Microsoft needs to continue down this road, given that its two biggest competitors - Google Android and Apple iOS - continue to struggle through their innate weaknesses.

It's absolutely true, as my former colleague Tom Dale argues, that Apple remains weak in web services and Google continues to stumble in user experience. The problem, as he articulates, is that "Google is getting better at design faster than Apple is getting better at web services," but both are making progress. If Microsoft steps back to focus solely on Windows 8, rather than seamlessly weaving into it web services and winning hardware design, then Microsoft stands to be the jack of all trades, and master of none. That's not a winning strategy in mobile. Not yet, anyway.

Hastings continues:

The challenge for [Microsoft] is: okay, what’s the profit stream, if the marketshare is different than it has been in the past? The big profit streams are from very high-share products — Office and Windows. So to the degree that the eventual revenue is not the same split as in the past, then there’s a threat to the profit stream.

Exactly... and guess what? Microsoft's primary revenue streams absolutely will be different from those it enjoyed in the past. As I've argued recently, Microsoft's Office suite is no longer the primary means of creating valuable business data/content. That's revenue stream number one in jeopardy. It's also the case that in mobile, the big market going forward, no one buys operating systems. Apple makes it part of the iPhone/iPad experience for free, and Android, of course, is open source. That's Microsoft's second big revenue stream eviscerated.

Which leaves us with Hastings' hope that somehow Surface will get users to take a look at Windows 8 and then go buy it elsewhere, like a Lenovo tablet (with a licence fee being paid by Lenovo to pre-install Windows 8). I'm sure Microsoft will make some money doing this, but it would be completely against the grain of where the industry is heading, and where money is being made today and for the foreseeable future in mobile.

Microsoft has the disparate elements - hardware design, operating system, web services - to put together a strong mobile strategy. But using Surface as a bait-and-switch of sorts feels like capitulating to the ghosts of Microsoft's past success. It may feel familiar, but "familiar" isn't going to win in today's market.

Microsoft's Windows 8 already faces fierce headwinds, as IT executives continue to favour Windows 7. Microsoft may want to do an end-run around IT executives to tap into the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) trend, but this is less likely to happen if Microsoft reverts to handing off hardware design and the integration of hardware, software, and web services to third parties. If Microsoft truly wants to tap into BYOD, it needs to stick with Surface as more than a tactic.

Windows 8 sales are said to be slow. They're certainly not going to pick up if Microsoft follows Hastings' advice. No one wants to buy an operating system anymore. They buy an ecosystem, and the gateway drug to that ecosystem is a tightly integrated user experience. The Surface is a great start on this for Microsoft. Focusing on Windows 8 in isolation of hardware is not. ®

Matt Asay is vice president of corporate strategy at 10gen, the MongoDB company. Previously he was SVP of business development at Nodeable, which was acquired in October 2012. He was formerly SVP of biz dev at HTML5 start-up Strobe (now part of Facebook) and chief operating officer of Ubuntu commercial operation Canonical. With more than a decade spent in open source, Asay served as Alfresco's general manager for the Americas and vice president of business development, and he helped put Novell on its open source track. Asay is an emeritus board member of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). His column, Open...and Shut, appears three times a week on The Register. You can follow him on Twitter @mjasay.

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

Re: No-one buys an OS?

@Neil B - the reason being that Microsoft punishes OEMs that dare put Linux on desktop computers by ceasing licencing "discounts". It's called monopoly abuse. When OEMs put Linux on Netbooks they sold very well and - contrary to FUD - the return rate was low. Then MS put a stop to that by insisting OEMs put Windows on Netbooks - and the netbook market practically died.

23
3

Re: You PAY, oh yes you do!

@Paul - all mobiles are locked down. Google's Android is the least locked down. You are welcome to install an alternative store to Google Play. That is a freedom not offered by Microsoft or Apple with their walled gardens.

Also, Android is open source and anyone can use that and not pay Google anything if they do not want to. Google provides a service that OEMs do wish to pay for.

Google is scary in the way that they own a lot of information about everybody, but they also offer the most open mobile OS - Android, so you exchange privacy for freedom. But no matter which mobile phone you use, you are still giving up privacy. The network operators know where you are. And apps can reveal info and so on.

16
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Microsoft needs to continue down this road...

It's crap to use on a desktop with a touch screen.

Reach out right now and try to touch your monitor. Monitor too far away? So move it from that comfortable viewing distance to something like 30cm away. Turn the brightness right down to stop pain to your eyes. Now press the monitor and hold your arm there for the same amount of time you'd generally use a mouse. Start to get tired pretty quickly eh, even at such a close distance?

My point is for touch screen to work on the desktop, the desk needs to be reinvented. The monitor needs to be where your keyboard is now, with a second monitor behind it at an angle to read from. You'd have to come up with a cunning way to integrate a keyboard, but then it would start to make sense. Until such desks arrive though, its absolutely pointless.

14
0

More from The Register

Nuke plants to rely on PDP-11 code UNTIL 2050!
Programmers and their walking sticks converge in Canada
Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry
Apple at WWDC: Sleek new iOS, death of the big cats, pint-sized Mac Pro
CEO Cook: 'The biggest change to iOS since the introduction of the iPhone'