Feeds

Cluster cake pulled open: Oozes cores, GPU gravy, mineral oil

Recipe for Student Cluster Compo destruction

Securing Web Applications Made Simple and Scalable

SC12 At last, I can reveal the final configurations of the systems the SC12 Student Cluster Competition (SCC) warriors brought to Salt Lake City last week.

Here’s the gear they were running…

First, kudos to all of the sponsors who generously provided so much equipment at no cost to the cluster crown competitors. (There isn’t a real crown.) How about next year, all of you chip in and we get an actual Cluster Crown that can go to the winning team? Maybe make it out of old motherboards and chips and stuff?

So, what’s noteworthy on the builds above? First, it’s too bad that I don’t have the total memory figures in the table above. Memory per node and per core is important and might explain some of performance differences that we’ll see in the final results. But that aside, there’s plenty of other interesting information in the table.

We see that at least five of the eight teams used graphics processing units (GPUs) this time around. Last year, about half the teams were using accelerators, and they dominated the field on both LINPACK and application performance. Team Longhorn used GPUs for the first time this year and was excited about the performance boost they’ve seen when compared to the traditional system they ran last year. Team Venus was thinking about using GPUs, but decided against it due to the team's relative inexperience with clusters and HPC in general. Purdue was also pondering the whole accelerator issue, and I think this will be their last non-hybrid SCC cluster.

Yum... not one but two flavours of GPU

Team Boston, sticking with their tradition of bringing anything that will run code, brought two flavours of GPUs. They also looked at running ARM processors and even talked about mixing some Phi (Intel Phi, that is) into their cluster cake. While their configuration sports 256 cores, I don’t think they were able to use them all during the competition due to power considerations. Teams are capped at 26 total amps (110 watts), and I’m pretty sure that if Boston fired up all that hardware at once, they’d be well past that limit.

The Chinese representatives, Teams NUDT and USTC, both brought six NVIDIA 2090s. NUDT had the lowest node count in the competition and yet the highest LINPACK score at just over 3 Teraflop/s. Their countrymen from USTC finished second with 2.73 Teraflop/s.

Laptops, a canister of mineral oil... and disappointment

And then there’s Team Red Raider from Texas Tech University. Every year at the SCC, there’s a team that seems almost cursed. Deliveries fall through, things break, software doesn’t perform like it did in the lab, etc. This year, that team is Team Red Raider.

They had big plans for SCC12. First, they designed their own immersion liquid cooling mechanism, using parts they scrounged or built themselves. They used an automobile transmission radiator for cooling and a boat bilge pump to move the liquid through flexible plastic piping to their homegrown server deep-fryer enclosure. They did a lot of custom engineering and shade tree fixes in order to make this design extremely efficient. (For more on the Texas Tech cluster, click here.

The only problem was that their system didn’t show up in Salt Lake City. It was somehow stuck in Mexico, of all places, and couldn’t be shipped in enough time to make the contest. At one point, the tech test system was going to be shipped to the show, but that fell through at the last minute. So the Red Raiders were left with laptops, a big canister full of mineral oil, and a huge sense of disappointment. But that’s not the end of the story…

Cluster kindness

When the rest of the field heard about the Red Raider problem, the teams from UT and Purdue stepped in and contributed some gear to get Texas Tech back in the game. Team Boston also contributed a couple of nodes to the effort. Meanwhile, both Dell and Mellanox came up with some servers to help fill out the rest of the cluster. The Texas Tech team busily incorporated all of this disparate gear into some sort of clustery order and managed to complete all of the scientific applications. Their attitude stayed upbeat, and they made the best of a bad situation.

Their configuration changed too quickly to keep up with, and I don’t think the final configuration is documented. But they ran what they had and put in a respectable showing. I hope they get the chance to compete next year.

Even though their cooling solution was homegrown, it was clear that they put an enormous amount of thought into it, and it would have consumed considerably less power than previous immersion solutions we’ve seen at SCC. According to the team, they were able to achieve a 4.0 teraflop/s LINPACK score in their lab under competition conditions. This would have landed them the LINPACK award for sure; who knows what they could have done on the scientific apps? But everyone’s system does better in the lab than in the real competition – so we need the Red Raiders to bring their stuff to SC13 in Denver and prove it.

More Student Cluster Competition coverage to follow. In upcoming blogs, we’ll talk to the teams on the final day of the competition, learn more about the LittleFe Traveling Salesman challenge, and attend the gala awards luncheon too. ®

The Essential Guide to IT Transformation

More from The Register

next story
Manic malware Mayhem spreads through Linux, FreeBSD web servers
And how Google could cripple infection rate in a second
EU's top data cops to meet Google, Microsoft et al over 'right to be forgotten'
Plan to hammer out 'coherent' guidelines. Good luck chaps!
US judge: YES, cops or feds so can slurp an ENTIRE Gmail account
Crooks don't have folders labelled 'drug records', opines NY beak
FLAPE – the next BIG THING in storage
Find cold data with flash, transmit it from tape
Seagate chances ARM with NAS boxes for the SOHO crowd
There's an Atom-powered offering, too
Gartner: To the right, to the right – biz sync firms who've won in a box to the right...
Magic quadrant: Top marks for, er, completeness of vision, EMC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
The Essential Guide to IT Transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIO's automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise.
Mobile application security vulnerability report
The alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, and the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Consolidation: the foundation for IT and business transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.