The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

SEC staffers slammed for serious security snafus

Took unsecured laptops to Black Hat hacker's soirée

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

There are red faces at the Securities and Exchange Commission after a report highlighted computer security failings by agency staff that forced it to spend $200,000 to check whether it had lost critical information.

Staff at the Trading and Markets Division were found to have stored highly confidential and market-sensitive information on their laptops without any encryption, even when out and about. Some staff attended the Black Hat hacking convention with these unsecured laptops, an act of lunacy given the predilections of the attendees.

The security failings came to light in a yet-to-be-released report ordered by the SEC's Interim Inspector General Jon Rymer. The report found that the SEC had to hire a third-party computer forensics specialist to go through its data and check to see if anything had been purloined by hackers – it appears that no systems were compromised.

Sources within the SEC said that the staff involved had been disciplined over the security failings following an internal investigation. Rich Adamonis, a spokesman for the New York Stock Exchange, told Reuters that the exchange was "disappointed" at the report's findings.

"From the moment we were informed, we have been actively seeking clarity from the SEC to understand the full extent of the use of improperly secured devices and the information involved, as well as the actions taken by the SEC to ensure that there is proper remediation and a complete audit trail for the information," he said.

What makes this doubly worrying is that the Trading and Markets Division has a responsibility for checking the security, audit, and disaster recovery systems used in the major equity markets. These policies essentially map out each exchange's infrastructure in a level of detail that would be a boon to anyone looking to hack the most lucrative markets in the world.

That the SEC attended Black Hat isn't surprising – but that they didn't secure their hardware is.

All attendees are warned in the conference materials to lock down their systems before attending, to run full-disk encryption, never use non-conference Wi-Fi, and to change all their passwords after the show is finished.

At this year's show, for example, a first-time press visitor from a national newspaper was sat down by the Black Hat flacks and had the rules explained to him in such frightening terms that he nearly reverted to note-taking with pencil and paper.

Hacking attendees' systems is actually frowned upon at Black Hat. The conference is keen to stress that it has grown up and that such behavior is seen as a breach of etiquette – but it goes on nevertheless.

But what's really worrying is whether the SEC staffers stayed on after Black Hat to attend the Defcon event that's held afterwards.

Every Defcon runs the Wall of Sheep, where teams of volunteers passively scan systems that log onto the conference network for insecurities. The publicly-displayed list shows the names, passwords (partially blacked out), domains, and applications of hacked systems, and those caught out receive some very humbling ridicule and helpful reminder to be smarter. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Re: exactly

That seems a bit paranoid

It's like suggesting that if you are a secret agent you shouldn't take USB keys full of classified material to a strip club.

6
0

Re: exactly

That almost cost me a new keyboard.

Paris, cause you know, strip clubs.

4
0

exactly

Secured or not, they realy should not be taking anything remotely private into a hacker convention. Certainly a laptop as you have said that is wiped after it is image dumped and compared with how it left to identify any possible new threats that poked there way onto it whilst there. Then popped into a cupboard after reimaging ready for next time. Reimaged from external DVD/blueray discs to eliminate any bios cleverness that may or may not infect a imaging server, trust nothing remember.

The only data that should ever be on a laptop at such places is test/madeup data that you want leaked to see how the water flows so to speak.

Security is only an illusion at a point in time, whats secure today is not garanteed secure tomorrow and with that was not secure when it was secure, also easier on the brain when you can just remove the security by making it a non issue.

4
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA PRISM snoop-gate: Won't someone think of the children, wails Apple
10,000 things probed, mostly about missing kids, Alzheimer patients, we're told
Flash flaw potentially makes every webcam or laptop a PEEPHOLE
But it's a Google problem - Chrome only, insists Adobe
Internet fraud still stings suckers
Australians twice as gullible as Americans
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
Yahoo! joins! rivals! in! PRISM! data! request! admission!
Keep calm and carry on using American tech firms, folks
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
Speech-to-text drives motorists to distraction
Will talking to you mean I crash into that car up ahead, Siri?
DHS warns of vulns in hospital medical equipment
Has your doctor's anasthesia machine been hacked?