Mystery robot-bringing UFOs sighted by Indian troops on Tibet border
'Not necessarily from outer space', reports paper
Mysterious UFOs have returned to a remote region on the Tibetan border, according to sightings by Indian troops stationed in the area. The UFOs, which have been reported for years, are said to have included a strange "robot like" figure seen by Indian scientists in 2004 walking along a mountain valley - which then "rapidly became airborne" and flew away.
We learn of the latest military sightings through the trenchant journalism of India Today, which says that Indian army troops and gendarmerie units of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force (ITBP) have been submitting reports of strange luminous airborne objects since the summer above the Ladakh region. Ladakh is a remote, mostly uninhabited but heavily militarised zone along the border with Tibet and China.
It seems that the Indian army has checked carefully and the UFOs in question are not manned or unmanned aircraft: these are routinely sighted in the area but can picked up on radar - unlike the UFOs. Indian army radars have been unable to track the strange shining objects. An unmanned aircraft despatched towards one UFO did sight it, but then "lost sight of the object".
According to India Today, the Indian government - stimulated to curiosity by the frequent reports from the military - despatched a scientific expedition to the region in September. The Indian boffins saw the UFOs but were unable to establish what they were.
The paper reports, magnificently:
Scientists say the mysterious objects are not necessarily from outer space.
(In fact the sense of the boffins interviewed by IT was that there is no reason to think they are from outer space, but this is much better.)
We also learn that UFOs have been reported in the Ladakh region for many years, with the best of these reports coming from a group of Indian government scientists who were in the area in 2004 studying glaciers:
A five-member group of geologists and glaciologists led by Dr Anil Kulkarni of the isro's Space Applications Centre in Ahmedabad were on a research trip through the barren Samudra Tapu Valley. They filmed a four-foot tall 'robot-like' figure, that 'walked' along the valley, 50 m away from them. The humanoid object then rapidly became airborne and disappeared. The encounter lasted 40 minutes. It was seen by 14 persons including the six scientists.
Though Dr Kulkarni's report was comprehensive, it appears to have been mysteriously ignored by the Indian government. A clue as to just why can be found in the IT report; we note that Kulkarni's description - in addition to its submission via scientific channels - was also supplied to unnamed "intelligence agencies ... the matter was buried soon after."
I think we all know what happened there. The excellent IT report can be read here courtesy of Yahoo! ®
It may also be worthy of note that a Nazi expedition brought back a small statue from Tibet in the 1930s which has since been confirmed to be of extraterrestrial origin.
Wet blanket time:
The Tibetan statue was _not_ of extraterrestrial origin. The material it was made from was.
Yeah, I agree.
Sorry, but if you filmed it and it was vaguely convincing, you could have had it on the news the next night, governmental approval or not.
And if you filmed it but it wasn't convincing, lots of people will laugh at you (have you SEEN the resolution and zoom of a cheapy digital video camera nowadays? It's unbelievable! But you "couldn't zoom in" and we're left staring at a couple of blurry pixels of actual data which could be anything from lens-flare to a insect on the lens?)
And if you didn't film it, well we have to take you on your word and there's a lot of (even highly qualified) nutters around. A straw poll of even a table full of doctors and scientists will find 50% of them have seen something they couldn't explain (e.g. ghosts, ufo's etc.). You'll even find a small percentage who are certain it was a <insert supernatural explanation here>, despite all their training and expertise.
Film, or it didn't happen.
And high-quality, focused, blur-free, still film with proper focus on that amazing object that you couldn't believe was there. Because I fail to believe that if I was seeing a UFO or similar, I wouldn't zoom in and get as much detail from the damn thing as I can in order for ME to tell what it was myself.
It's like claiming that someone at a football match wouldn't use the pair of binoculars in their hand to see if it was a goal at the other end of not at the most exciting, critical part of the FA cup. Of course they would, if they had them to hand. They wouldn't peer through them at zero-zoom so the point of interest is some blurry half-a-dozen pixel affair, they'd be trying to check what they were seeing as clearly as possible.