Feeds

Microsoft-Netflix bid rumours feast on froth – and logic

Perfect fit?

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Some of the big takeovers in the pay TV arena have taken analysts by surprise, but that will not be the case if, as looks increasingly likely, Microsoft tables a bid for Netflix.

We all know where the rumour began, with the announcement early in October that Netflix CEO Reed Hastings was standing down from his other big role as a Microsoft director. This would certainly have been a necessary preparatory step for a bid, avoiding or at least reducing accusations of conflict of interest on Hastings’s part in determining the value and nature of a bid while on the Microsoft board, or with his Netflix hat on whether to accept or reject it.

It is true that Hastings’ move may instead have reflected Microsoft’s continuing advance into paid OTT (over the top - definition) through content delivered via broadband on Xbox Live.

But that in turn would suggest Netflix itself could be on its radar screen, since Xbox Live alone will not turn Microsoft into a major all-round player in multimedia entertainment, competing with Google, Apple and Amazon.

And just as if to tell us to take this potential bid seriously, corporate raider Carl Icahn on Wednesday 31 October revealed that he picked up almost 10 per cent of Netflix stock, in an attempt to gain a leveraged position in any fully fledged takeover bid. The move drove up the share price 20 per cent on the day.

Buying Netflix would be entirely consistent with Microsoft’s emerging strategy for Xbox 360, morphing it from a pure video game console into an all round entertainment device. This in turn accords with other Microsoft moves, such as its launch into tablets, and the $8.5 billion takeover of Skype announced in May 2011, as well as the earlier abortive and ill-conceived attempt to buy Yahoo!.

Microsoft’s future is as a multimedia ecosystem giant of the IP age, which would lean it very much towards becoming a major OTT player with an efficient infrastructure dedicated to internet video delivery, rather than say an MSO (cable operator) with a load of unwanted infrastructure baggage that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into the IP age.

There are few candidates so right for Microsoft, the right size, the right price and in pole position in the right business

That doesn’t leave a lot of candidates of suitable calibre for Microsoft that are also affordable, other than Netflix. It really lies in the sweet spot of Microsoft’s target because it is an iconic brand whose stock among the world’s public is still increasing as the very same time as its actual stock value has sunk quite a lot, at $60 to $70 compared with its year high of $133.

This gives it a market capitalization around $3.7 billion, which is easily within Microsoft’s compass given it has $69 billion in cash, plus investments, even if only a proportion of that is readily to hand to acquire a US company, being scattered around the world in various overseas portfolios.

Also, the very investments that have made Netflix attractive to Microsoft, notably its international expansion and global CDN (content delivery network) infrastructure, have also helped depress its capitalization.

This was evident when the share price tumbled after the recent announcement of Q3 results, despite revenues being well up and marginally ahead of expectations at $905 million for the quarter compared with $822 million in the same period of 2011, while adding 1.16 million domestic streaming customers in the quarter, and 690,000 international streaming subs. This brought the domestic total to 25.1 million, which was within the predicted range of 24.9 million to 25.7 million, and the international total to 4.31 million, while DVD subs fell 630,000 to 8.61 million.

The adverse market reaction was caused by falling net income caused by the investments, down to $8 million for the quarter compared with $62 million a year earlier. The market was also spooked a little by Netflix’s warning that it could make a small loss in Q4, and that it may end with 27 million streaming customers, which is well short of the earlier forecasts of around 28.7 million subs.

Microsoft will have noted that international streaming sub gains exceeded all expectations, and that Netflix is the clear number one in streaming content. And from Netflix’s point of view a Microsoft takeover could be timely.

The company experienced great early success in negotiating lucrative movie rights when the big studios were not paying much attention to online streaming and were caught unawares by the rapid growth, but it is now finding it much harder going to obtain the lucrative early release windows. In some cases others, like HBO, are getting better deals, but Microsoft’s clout could help regain the best window positions. Microsoft has good relations with some of the very same rights holders that Netflix has been running into difficulties with.

But then on the last day of October the situation changed again as Netflix shares rose by 20 per cent after activist investor Carl Icahn reported a stake of nearly 10 per cent in the company. Icahn disclosed the stake in a regulatory filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the filing, Icahn bought the shares because he finds them undervalued due to Netflix's "dominant market position and international growth prospects."

"Netflix may hold significant strategic value for a variety of significantly larger companies that are engaging in more direct competition with one another due to the evolution of the internet, mobile ...," Icahn reported in the filing.

What difference that will make to Microsoft’s deliberations remains to be seen. But it does suggest a bidding war may emerge, with other potential candidates being Amazon, Google, or possibly even Verizon.

Copyright © 2012, Faultline

Faultline is published by Rethink Research, a London-based publishing and consulting firm. This weekly newsletter is an assessment of the impact of the week's events in the world of digital media. Faultline is where media meets technology. Subscription details here.

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.