Sock-wielding movie pirates go to prison
Walk-on parts in the Big House
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Two members of a movie piracy gang were sent to prison yesterday in Virginia.
Willie Lambert, 57, of Pittston PA, was sent down for 30 months and ordered to pay $450,000 in restitution, along with other co-defendants. Sean Lovelady, 28, of Pomona, CA, was sentenced to 23 months and must pay $7,500 in restitution. Two more members of the gang, Jeramiah Perkins and Gregory Cherwonik, are to be sentenced later.
The defendants teamed up under the name 'IMAGiNE' to distribute via the internet copies of films only showing in cinemas. Their aim was to be the premier piracy group to do this.
The group used FM and infra-red receivers to capture and record the audio portion of films. They captured the video portion by recording the film on camcorders smuggled into the movie theatre.
Back at base, they merged the sound file and "cammed" copy into a single film for distribution.
Between 2009 and 2011 IMAGiNE illegally recorded at least 20 films, according to the indictment, including Avatar and Iron Man 2. They distributed the films via their own websites, with names such as unleashthe.net, hosted on servers in France, Canada and the US.
Such websites included, among other things, member profiles, a torrent tracker…, discussion forums, a message board or shoutbox", and news, rules and other information about making donations [via PayPal]to and using the IMAGiNE Group's website.
On unleashthe.net, an unnamed conspirator to members how to "cam' movies: cover the the camcorder with black tape and put it "inside a black sock with a hole at the end to let the lens out…"
How did they think they would get away with this? ®
COMMENTS
"...How did they think they would get away with this?..."
More to the point, who combines a longing to see the latest Hollywood crap-fest so badly, with a freetardery so ingrained they'd rather watch a cobbled together version filmed hand-held through a sock, than shell out a couple of $$$ to catch it at a cinema?
You folks don't get it
The fact that the viewing quality of camera-captured movies stinks doesn't matter.
On the providing end, it is a matter of bragging rights -- make that "bragging rites." There is competition among the various pirate groups for first release. Then there is further competition about (what passes for) quality.
On the consuming end, it is a game, comparing, by skimming through, the (lack of) quality of subsequent releases by subsequent pirate groups of the same movie. It's a hobby, mostly for tweeners and teens, collecting pirated movie releases, like other people collect stamps or commemorative plates. The fact that they're breaking the law adds to the mystique.
Only the most brain-dead freetard would actually watch such bilge rather then paying money to see the film at a theater.
Prosecuting the pirates is the same old scam as always. It's based on the myth that piracy costs the studios money in lost ticket sales.
Couple of $$$?
You've obviously not been to the cinema in a while!
Last time I went, it cost about $65 for 2 us...
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
