The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple unsheathes MacBook 13-incher

Thinner, lighter, pricier, more pixelicous, less optically inclined

Cloud based data management

When Apple released the inelegantly named 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display this June, every Cupertino-watcher knew that it was only a matter of time before the other shoe dropped and its 13-inch sibling got the same retinal treatment – and on Tuesday it did.

No surprise. The 13-inch version was first rumored mere days after the 15-incher was announced, and suggestions of its impending arrival kicked up again just last week.

Not only that, but as Apple's chief shiller Phil Schiller told the attendees at Apple's "a little more" event on Tuesday in San José, California, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is not only Cupertino's top-selling notebook, but it's also the top-selling Mac, bar none. There was no way that Apple was going to exclude that best-seller from the Retina Display party.

And so Schiller introduced his audience to the new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display, now available for $1,699, a $500 bump up from the überpopular non-Retina 13-inch MacBook Pro.

"In typical Apple fashion," Shiller said without a hint of modesty, "we're going to take our best product, and we're going to introduce something that's so much better."

Is it $500 better? Well, value – like beauty – is certainly in the eye of the beholder, but it's abundantly clear that the 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display (Can I just call it the 13iMBPwRD? Thanks.) isn't merely the older 13-incher with an improved-resolution display slapped onto it. It's a complete rework of the top-seller, as was the 15iMBPwRD from its progenitor.

15-inch and 13-inch MacBook Pros with Retina Display

The 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display (right) joins its 15-inch big brother, announced this June

The 13iMBPwRD, for example, is 20 per cent thinner than its 13-inch predecessor, measuring a mere .75 inches (19mm) in thickness. It's lighter, as well, weighing in at 3.57 pounds (1.62kg), just under a pound less than its 4.5-pound immediate ancestor.

That thinness and weight loss was helped along by jettisoning the notebook's optical drive – a loss some of us find disconcerting while others could give the proverbial rat's patootie.

The main reason for the shrinkage in thickness and weight, Schiller said, was that Apple started afresh when designing the 13iMBPwRD. "Everything about the new MacBook Pro has been re-engineered from scratch," he said.

For one example, Schiller referred to the 13iMBPwRD's asymmetric lithium-ion battery technology – not exactly a brand-spanking-new juice-storing tech, but since he pointed it out with some relish, we'd be interested to know if it's the first time such batteries have been used in Apple or other notebooks.

Size, weight, and a claimed seven-hour battery life are all well and good, but it's clear that the new notebook's 13.3-inch, 227-pixels-per-inch display is its premier feature. Its 2560-by-1600 pixels, Schiller pointed out, provide more raw pixelage (4,096,000 of the wee things) than any other 15-inch or 17-inch notebooks – except, of course, for its 2880-by-1800 pixel 15-inch MacBook Pro brother, which lights up 5,184,000 colored dots.

13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display ports, left and right

Looking for an optical-drive slot? Stop. You won't find one

The collection of ports offered on the 13iMBPwRD are a departure from its non-Retina forebear. Gone is the FireWire 800 port, added are two full-fledged Thunderbolt ports and an HDMI port. The notebook now has two microphones rather than one, presumably to add noise cancellation for such uses as FaceTime video conferencing and OS X Mountain Lion's dictation capability.

The 13iMBPwRD is powered by a 2.5GHz dual-core 3rd Generation ("Ivy Bridge") Intel Core i5 processor with 3MB L3 cache shared between the cores, communing with 8GB of 1600MHz DDR3L memory. A 2.9GHz dual-core 3rd-gen Intel Core i7 4MB shared L3 cache is available as an option; each processor includes Intel's HD 4000 integrated graphics. Storage is all SSD, all the time, available in 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, and 768GB variants.

As we mentioned above, the base model – with 8GB of memory and a 128GB SSD – runs $1,699 and is available immediately. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Re: Price- eek!

Oh just shut up. Seriously - do you hang out in Apple stores just to tell them what you aren't going to buy?

"See that? I'm not buying that. In fact I'm going to go and buy an S3! NER! See that? I'm not buying that EITHER! Take THAT Apple! Oh that that! That too. And I'm not having one of THOSE - no way. Ha ha - tossers."

8
3

Re: price comparisons

you're forgetting that UK/EU prices include VAT, US prices don't include sales tax - that could give you your price difference.

4
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: The only snag...

Most people use wifi or do not see an issue leaving a small and relatively cheap adapter on their Ethernet cable.

4
0

More from The Register

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Proof the pen is mightier?
Sammy’s iPad Mini killer has a stylus to stab other rivals too
Microsoft lures buy-curious vixens, corduroys with a cheap fondle
Surface slab sales latest: Will no one rid Ballmer of these turbulent tabs?
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?