Brazilians strip Google News bare: News barons decide to pull out
Google News 'presence' in Brazil is 'small'
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Members of the National Association of Newspapers in Brazil (ANJ) have decided to stop Google from displaying snippets of their content on the internet giant's 'News' service.
ANJ, which represents publishers making up approximately 90 per cent of the newspaper circulation market in Brazil, said that the appearance of its members' content on Google News was a hindrance to their plans to grow their online presence, according to a report by the Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas.
According to the Knight Center report, ANJ president Carlos Fernando Lindenberg Neto said:
Google News benefits commercially from that quality content and is unwilling to discuss a remuneration model for the production of these materials. Staying in Google News was not helping us grow our digital audiences. On the contrary, by providing the first few lines of our stories to internet users, the service reduces the chances that they will look at the entire story in our websites.
Lindenberg said that the potential loss of traffic to newspaper websites generated by Google News was "an acceptable price [to pay] to protect our content and brands". He said Google News' "presence" in Brazil was "small", according to the Knight Center report.
However, Google has claimed that its News service helps to direct a billion 'clicks' to news websites around the world, the report said.
Google has recently outlined its opposition to plans in France that would force search engines to pay in order to display links to publishers' content in its search engine rankings. Similar plans are being developed in Germany. Google has threatened to stop displaying links to French publishers' content if the government in France introduces such a law.
In May 2011 a court in Belgium ruled that Google had infringed copyright in newspaper reports when it linked to the papers' websites or copied sections of stories on its Google News service. The ruling backed an earlier judgment by the Court of First Instance in Belgium.
Copiepresse, an agency acting for newspapers, sued Google on behalf of the papers in 2006. The newspapers argued that they were losing online subscriptions and advertising revenue because Google was posting free snippets of the stories and links to the full article on Google News.
However, as well as stopping the Google News snippets the internet giant also stopped displaying links to the newspaper websites via its search engine results. It returned the links to search engine results only after Copiepresse gave it permission to "re-include" the sites in the indexes. Google had said it would be happy to include the Belgian newspaper websites in its search results if they would waive the potential penalties a court could issue.
The newspapers had complained that Google had been "unnecessarily aggressive" in removing them from the search engine.
Copyright © 2012, Out-Law.com
Out-Law.com is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.
COMMENTS
This just doesn't seem well thought through
Just using my personal experience, the snippet in Google news doesn't give anywhere near enough information about a story and I am far more likely to click on the link through to read it if it interests me.
In fact using Google news I visit sites I would most definitely not visit normally (eg. Daily Mail UK) just because they've managed to bag an interesting story or have an interesting take on something.
If it doesn't work for them why doesn't the online news outlet just take 5 minutes to add a robots.txt file to their site? They can see the impact and then remove it if it doesn't work out for them.
As for removing all the Belgian links from the search engine - well seeing as the search engine links give a page preview and snippet as well, then surely Google could potentially become liable for that as well?
Oh yeah?
The newspapers had complained that Google had been "unnecessarily aggressive" in removing them from the search engine.
And who started this almighty game of silly buggers in the first place? Google's action sounds like a rather obvious version of; ".......and the horse you rode in on."
*facepalm*
By directing people to read our articles, they're taking away our business. This just seems silly, it basically comes down to "Our business model isn't working online as well as it did in brick and mortar stores, so we're blaming google despite the fact it's the only way half the people would find our service in the first place"
I mean I'm sorry, but some people pay good money to get that kind of advertisement to their sites, and they're getting it for free. What are the bets google will remove them from all search indexes, subscription will drop further, and then they'll complain that google has stiffed them by directed traffic to competitors.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
