The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Royal Society hosts edit-a-thon to get women onto Wikipedia

In the form of information, and as nerditors too

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

The Royal Society is hosting an edit-a-thon for Wikipedia, signing up a bunch of contributors to spend one day adding and editing articles about female scientists including black female neurosurgeon Alexa Canady and UCL Biomedical Imaging expert Eleanor Maguire.

The Wiki-eds will have access to a whole host of material from the Royal Society library including biographies and published papers: the society's librarians have already located relevant documents and will be helping the eds.

Coming two days after Ada Lovelace day the initiative is intended to boost the content about women available on Wikipedia and also teach volunteers about editing Wikipedia.

The fact that only 9% of Wikipedia editors are women is a much-knocked about chestnut and this is an attempt to do something about it, led by Professor Uta Frith of University College London. She said:

Wikipedia is one of the first places that many people go for information but if it’s not there how will we ever learn about our scientific heroines. This event is a very small but important step towards putting these very special women in the spotlight they deserve.

Wikipedia has put together a list of potential entries - notable female scientists who lack full Wikipedia entries. Remote editors can join in on the twitter hashtag #womenSciWP. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Re: What's the betting...

Citation needed! Or were you doing original research? Maybe you are a self-hating jew? I do think your contribution is unbalanced. Please comment on the talk page!

3
0
Anonymous Coward

The truth is there are not as many female scientists as male scientists and fewer famous female scientists that warrant an article. I doubt it's due to most editors being male that there are fewer articles on female scientists. It's because there are fewer of them to write about. I'm sure the numbers of articles on female celebrities or authors would be higher. The content of Wikipedia is just reflecting society. Wikipedia itself is not biased towards men.

There is no discrimination of gender on who can be an editor on Wikipedia. The Internet is as genderless as you make it. People are not under an obligation to reveal their gender. For whatever reason, women just seem less interested or inclined to voluntarily edit Wikipedia in their free time.

3
0

Consider Her Ways

A Novella by John Wyndham, was rather a long way ahead with that concept...

3
0

More from The Register

Reg hack prepares to live off wondergloop Soylent
Our man puts eating people powder Food 2.0 to the test
ROBOT COW teaches Saudi kids where milk comes from
Udderly ridiculous bovine intervention is beyond the pail
 breaking news
Who's to be the next Dr Who? Sherlock beats Maurice - says you
Cumberbatch EXTERMINATES Ayoade, Atkinson, Pegg - and Tilda Swinton
Chewbacca held up by TSA stormtroopers for having light sabre
'Mrauuun' 'Right, Chewie, giant man do need giant cane'
 breaking news
I told you I'd be back: Arnie set for another career revival
Don't worry voters, Schwarzenegger's talking about Terminator 5
Waving an Eye-of-Sauron pulsating mock cock? STOP IMMEDIATELY
Mains-powered sex aid recalled ... Ultimate O turns into ultimate OH NO
At #guardiancoffee, we can now TASTE THE FUTURE through a PRISM!
I have measured out my life in espresso spoons
Oracle's Ellison outlines plans for Hawaiian Electriclarryland
Solar-sourced eau d'Oracle the key to island revival
Soylent days and soylent nights
Food 2.0 fails the post-pub nosh test
BEYOND Marxism: What Google learned from staring Glassily at Norks
Boobs, Noobs and Juche-oriented networked facilitators