Feeds

Moon was formed when PLANET SMASHED INTO EARTH

'Theia' absorbed into core, lies beneath our feet today

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

That old theory that the Moon was formed out of fragments of Earth blasted into space after a massive planetary collision 4.5 billion years ago has gained support from two new studies.

Giant impact, common at the end of planet formation

Boffins have tried to figure out exactly how a giant impact in our solar system made the Moon. Previous theories have suggested that the celestial body could have been made from pieces of the mysterious planet that crashed into Earth, but recent studies showing that Earth and the Moon have the same isotopic composition pour water on that idea.

To make the Moon out of the Earth however, requires different conditions for proto-Earth.

Matija Cuk of SETI and Sarah Stewart of Harvard reckon the Moon was formed by the rapid spin of the ancient Earth. If its rotation rate at the time of interplanetary dust-up was significantly speedier, giving a "day" of just two to three hours, the planet would have thrown off the necessary material to form the Moon.

If the Earth was spinning through a day of just two hours, it would be near the point when it would start to fly apart itself from rotation forces, making it much easier to throw away loose bits of itself. After that, the so-called "evection" resonance between the orbiting bodies of the Earth round the Sun and the Moon round the Earth eventually changed the planet's rotation rate to the 24-hour day we have today.

The other part of the mystery is the lack of iron on the Moon, which would be taken care of by the planet that smashes into the Earth, named Theia. In computer simulations, Theia has to be half the mass of Mars and strike at 20km/s in order to penetrate into the core of the Earth and throw material out some of which escapes Earth's gravity. In this scenario, Theia's iron core merges with the Earth's core, leaving the mantle to make the Moon, with a similar isotopic composition but a low iron content.

The second study, by Robin Canup at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, also backs the impact theory, but she reckons that the Earth and the planet that hit it were each around half of the Earth's current mass.

Both Cuk and Stewart's study and Canup's study were published in Science. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
GRAV WAVE DRAMA: 'Big Bang echo' may have been grit on the scanner – boffins
Exit Planet Dust on faster-than-light expansion of universe
SpaceX Dragon cargo truck flies 3D printer to ISS: Clawdown in 3, 2...
Craft berths at space station with supplies, experiments, toys
That glass of water you just drank? It was OLDER than the SUN
One MEELLION years older. Some of it anyway
NASA rover Curiosity drills HOLE in MARS 'GOLF COURSE'
Joins 'traffic light' and perfect stony sphere on the Red Planet
Big dinosaur wowed females with its ENORMOUS HOOTER
That's right, Doris, I've got biggest snout in the prehistoric world
Japanese volcano eruption reportedly leaves 31 people presumed dead
Hopes fade of finding survivors on Mount Ontake
Canberra drone team dances a samba in Outback Challenge
CSIRO's 'missing bushwalker' found and watered
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.