The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple files 'Shake to Print' iOS patent application

What's more intuitive than shaking your iPad to print, eh?

  • print
  • alert

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Apple has filed a brace of patents that, in part, describe methods to control printing and print settings by having the user physically interact with their iOS device by "shaking, flipping, rotating, spinning, moving laterally or to follow a shape, or combinations of these."

In US Patent and Trademark Office applications 20120250071 and 20120250072, Apple asserts that since some devices – think iPhones and iPads – have a relatively small display, the provision of on-screen print settings might result in user interface items that are too small for easy use. "An alternative approach for defining print settings may be advantageous," they explain.

Apple's solution in these two patent applications is for the user to shake the device to enable print mode, then further physically manhandle the device to enable different printing options – say, flipping the device from front-to-back on its long axis to indicate long-edge binding, or top-to-bottom to indicate short-edge binding.

Apple also suggests flipping the device over and then shaking it to cancel a print setting. "By combining a shaking motion with a flipping motion," both applications suggest, "the electronic device can reduce incidents of accidental canceling."

Perhaps there's some merit in this "shake-to-print" concept, but The Reg is not convinced. Part of our misgivings – aside from, well, the silliness involved – stem from the shaky history of shakiness as a UI element in iOS.

iPhones and iPads have enabled shake to Undo and Redo typing-deletion capability since iOS 3.0 – there's even a third-party app to accomplish the same feat on a MacBook Pro.

Illustration from Apple's 'shake to print' patent application

Want to print an image? Make like LL Cool J and 'Shake it, baby, shake it'

Unfortunately, this iOS "feature" has garnered its share of complaints in Apple support threads such as "Disable Shake to Undo", "After 3.0 update "Nothing to Undo" error message", "Turning off shake to undo", and "Please let us turn off shake to undo 'feature'". Although there's a third-party app called ShakeToUndo Killer to disable shaky deletions, you'll need to jailbreak your iPhone to install it.

Apple has also enabled users to shake to shuffle tunes since iOS 3.0, but in this case the shaky feature can be turned off in Settings > Music. Perhaps Apple took to heart one of the comments in an Apple discussion thread about shake to Undo and Redo: "Occasionally Apple gets too cute for it's [sic] own good," commenter Steve Sussman wrote. "Once you get over the 'gee I can shake my phone' factor there's nothing particularly useful about it."

Excuse us for being stick-in-the-mud traditionalists, but The Reg is of the opinion that Sussman's assessment of shaking his iPhone to delete typing may reasonably be extended to shaking it to print. ®

Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider

Game Over

It's one of infinite number of variations on "Shake to ..." where "..." is whatever functionality you wish to dream up.

The patentable technology is shake detection and notifications in software. What software does in response to a shake is not patentable, imho.

If a patent is issued for this then it's game over man. Game over.

8
0

Prior Art

I used to have to pick my old Epson printer up and give it a shake in order to get the fecking thing to print anything.

5
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Game Over

Cyanogen and I believe the Galaxy S have had "turn over to answer" features in the past. Shake detection shouldn't even be patentable; you can't patent shaking something. The United States of Patents is getting absurd. What is wrong with copyrighting the implementation? Why does everything need a patent?

It's a good thing they've got PS3 controllers working with Android since getting into print settings looks funnily like how you'd control a driving based game.

5
0

More from The Register

Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Nuke plants to rely on PDP-11 code UNTIL 2050!
Programmers and their walking sticks converge in Canada
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry