Feeds

Formlabs preps first home stereolithic 3D printer

Laser tech makes for higher-res objects

Build a business case: developing custom apps

3D printing geeks have become very excited about Formlabs' Form 1, the first home-oriented stereolithography 3D printer. While affordable 3D printers are becoming more widespread, what makes the Form 1 special is that instead of piping resin through an extruder, it uses lasers to heat and harden a point within a bath of liquid resin.

This form of 3D printing has been around for some time, but until the arrival of the Form 1 has been fantastically expensive. The Form 1 was designed by a team of MIT engineers on the established principal of building the device they themselves wanted to use. The initial price is around $2000 (£1238).

FormLabs Form 1

The greatest advantage of a stereolithography printer is that it has a very much higher resolution than an extruder. The new extruder-based Makerbot 2 prints at 100 micros while Form 1 claims 25 microns.

It’s also much more reliable and repeatable. Getting the temperature right with extruders can be hit and miss - what’s fine for some models causes others to crack. Stereolithography doesn’t have these problems.

There is clearly a huge pent-up demand for high quality 3D printing. Form 1 raised over a $1 million in its first week on crowdsourced funding site Kickstarter. This is ten times the target Formlabs set.

FormLabs Form 1 output examples

Formlabs is claiming much friendlier printing software than previous solutions, although in fairness that’s not hard. The printing might be friendlier but the chemicals are not. The liquid resin has to be handled with care, it’s typically much more expensive – think three times the price for a model – and only available from Formlabs.

Initially, it will be a matte grey, with other colours to come. The higher priced powder-based systems can print in full colour while home extruder systems can print in two colours.

Shipments are due to start in February 2013 with European shipments following in March. ®

Simon Rockman blogs about phones for older users at FussFreePhones

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
Tip: Put the shades on and you'll look less of a spanner
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
One step closer to ROBOT BUTLERS: Dyson flashes vid of VACUUM SUCKER bot
Latest cleaner available for world+dog in September
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.