Feeds

Zuckerberg loses $8bn in Facebook IPO fiasco

Wee lad's Forbes 400 booty ranking mercilessly keelhauled

New hybrid storage solutions

File this under "Problems you'll never have": Facebook headman Mark Zuckerberg lost over $8bn of his net worth due to his company's wretched IPO.

This news comes from The Forbes 400, that magazine's annual list of the 400 richest Americans. This year, Zuckerberg sank from 2011's ranking of 14th on the list with a net worth of $17.5bn all the way down to number 36.

Still and all, don't shed a tear for the 28-year-old cofounder, chairman, and CEO of the world's biggest social-networking website – his net worth still totals $9.4bn, according to Forbes.

Facebook launched its initial public offering on the NASDAQ exchange this May amidst great hoopla, but instead of rising into the stratosphere, as expected by some, the share price immediately slipped below its $45 opening.

The share price has stayed below the IPO level ever since, dropping as low as $17.55 earlier this month. As we click the "Publish" button on this article at 11am Pacific time on Wednesday, the share price has recovered somewhat to $22.61 – but that's only pennies over half of Facebook's IPO price.

Still, $9.4bn is far from chump change. As Forbes notes, "The drop isn't likely to change the hoodie-wearing CEO's lifestyle much."

The other tech billionaires on Forbes list? Well, Bill Gates still leads the pack as he has for the past 19 years, with a net worth of $66bn despite having given away $28bn – so far.

Larry Ellison's $41bn earns him third place, a mere $5bn behind the number two richest man in America, Warren Buffet. Amazon's Jeff Bezos' $23.2bn just misses the top ten – he's number 11, right behind New York mayor Michael Boomberg's $25bn.

Google's Larry Page and Sergey Brin tie for 13th with $20.3bn each, Steve Ballmer's $15.9bn slots him in at 19th on the list, with Michael Dell close behind in 22nd place with $14.6bn.

Not only must Zuckerberg suffer the indignity of being the billionaire who sank farther in 2012 than anyone else, he also must share 36th place with a man who could be argued to be one of the more unsavory characters among The Forbes 400: Rupert Murdoch.

Zuckerberg, however, can console himself that his fate is not as socially awkward as some others' – Zynga's Mark Pincus and Groupon's Eric Lefkofsky dropped off the list entirely. ®

The next step in data security

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
JINGS! Microsoft Bing called Scots indyref RIGHT!
Redmond sporran metrics get one in the ten ring
Driving with an Apple Watch could land you with a £100 FINE
Bad news for tech-addicted fanbois behind the wheel
Murdoch to Europe: Inflict MORE PAIN on Google, please
'Platform for piracy' must be punished, or it'll kill us in FIVE YEARS
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Sony says year's losses will be FOUR TIMES DEEPER than thought
Losses of more than $2 BILLION loom over troubled Japanese corp
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.