Feeds

Elpida stakeholders beg US courts: Stop Micron's cheap meal deal

Injured DRAMurai warrior's bondholders go Stateside to stop $2.5bn slurp

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Elpida bondholders trying to stop the sale of the wounded DRAMurai warrior to Micron have taken the fight to the US courts, claiming that the bankrupt Japanese firm has had "unauthorised" transactions in the States.

Elpida went bankrupt in February and limped around looking for a white knight before US firm Micron eventually swooped in with a $2.5bn (200bn yen, £1.6bn)) offer that the bondholders allege is unfair and doesn't value the company realistically. They want to keep Elpida running with some additional investment instead of selling it off.

Although the deal is under Japanese jurisdiction, Elpida's US assets were already under the protection of Delaware's bankruptcy court, a common move for foreign firms with operations in America. Chapter 15 allows courts there to block creditors from seizing the US assets.

The bondholders' steering committee is using the US court proceeding to try to take down the entire Micron deal by putting Elpida's American subsidiary into a separate bankruptcy proceeding there.

Yesterday, the committee filed just before a scheduled hearing to stop Elpida putting in a report on the Japanese restructuring under seal, outing the illicit dealings at the same time.

"The fact that information about the four unauthorised transactions affecting US assets subject to this court's jurisdiction might be unflattering or prejudicial does not make [the report] protectable," the filing said. "Public disclosure of these transactions is critical for stakeholders of Elpida to understand and then exercise their rights in this chapter 15 case."

The bondholders are also trying to block the Micron deal in Japan, where a Tokyo court is reviewing their plan to save Elpida as well as Micron's offer. The court will decide whether either or both of the plans is suitable to be sent to creditors for a vote. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.