Feeds

Scientists provide a measure of uncertainty

What would Heisenberg’s position be?

Build a business case: developing custom apps

A group of Canadian PhD researchers claim to have obtained information beyond the “Heisenberg limit” using a technique called “weak measurement”.

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle limits the amount of information that can be known at the quantum level: the more you know about the position of an object, the less you can know about its momentum. As this article at Phys.org puts it, “any attempt to measure a particle’s position must randomly change its speed”.

The University of Toronto researchers have looked at measurements of a single property – polarization – and how to obtain information about polarization without disturbing it.

The answer is to use a technique described as “weak measurement”, in which the quantum system is probed with a very small interaction, so as to obtain information about it with a minimum of change. The idea is to try and work around the problem Heisenberg originally framed, the “observer effect”.

Lee Rozema, a University of Toronto PhD student and lead author of the study, designed an apparatus to measure a photon’s polarization, making a weak measurement of the photon before it was sent to the apparatus. That pre-measurement, they found, induced less disturbance than predicted by Heisenberg’s precision-disturbance relation.

By repeating the experiment many times, the researchers say, they were able to “get a very good idea about how much the photon is disturbed”.

As the American Physical Society notes, while Heisenberg’s statement of the minimum uncertainty any quantum system must possess is “rigorously proven”, doubt has been cast on his calculation of the observer effect in recent years.

There is a practical application to all of this. Systems like quantum cryptography use the precision-disturbance relation to decide whether or not a communication has been “sniffed” (so to speak). Work such as Rozema’s suggests that the mathematics used to decide whether or not a quantum channel is secure might have to be revised. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Boffins attempt to prove the UNIVERSE IS JUST A HOLOGRAM
Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?
Our LOHAN spaceplane ballocket Kickstarter climbs through £8000
Through 25 per cent but more is needed: Get your UNIQUE rewards!
LOHAN tunes into ultra long range radio
And verily, Vultures shall speak status unto distant receivers
SpaceX prototype rocket EXPLODES over Texas. 'Tricky' biz, says Elon Musk
No injuries or near injuries. Flight stayed in designated area
Galileo, Galileo! Galileo, Galileo! Galileo fit to go. Magnifico
I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me. But at least I can find my way with ESA GPS by 2017
EOS, Lockheed to track space junk from Oz
WA facility gets laser-eyes out of the fog
China building SUPERSONIC SUBMARINE that travels in a BUBBLE
Shanghai to San Fran in two hours would be a trick, though
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.