Feeds

Apache man disables Internet Explorer 10 privacy setting

Fielding: Windows 8's web window is 'standards abuse'

New hybrid storage solutions

Apache HTTP daddy Roy Fielding has patched his popular server, telling it to ignore user privacy web settings in Internet Explorer 10.

The Fielding patch will mean millions of web servers will ignore the Do Not Track header that's sent to them by users in IE 10, the browser for Windows 8.

Apache is used by nearly 600 million websites – about 60 per cent – according to Netcraft.

Fielding, a member of Apache who is also involved in drafting a World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C’s) DNT specification here, posted the code to Github with the message: “Apache does not tolerate deliberate abuse of open standards.”

Microsoft is also a member of the working group drafting the specification with Fielding.

Windows 8 turns DNT on in IE10 by default and gives the user the freedom to turn it off using the Express and Customize settings during Win8's set-up. But unless the user actively turns it off – or on – the advertisers can choose to ignore the default setting, Fielding argues.

DNT has became a hot issue among browser makers. Mozilla was the first browser-maker to institute the anti-stalking techniques, with Firefox 4 in 2010, by adding an HTTP header in its browser that alerts websites that the user would like to opt out of online behavourial advertising.

Microsoft made much of its addition of DNT, calling it “our commitment to privacy by design and putting people first.” “We believe consumers should have more control over how data about their online behaviour is tracked, shared, and used,” chief privacy officer Brendon Lynch blogged when Microsoft said DNT by default was coming to IE10.

Mozilla has opposed Microsoft’s approach, saying the decision to go DNT must be the user’s choice.

Fielding seems to objecting to DNT being turned on by default, arguing that Redmond "knows" DNT will be ignored by websites and ads networks that insist on seeing DNT turned on by a human instead – as a matter of preference.

Fielding wrote of his action:

The only reason DNT exists is to express a non-default option. That's all it does. It does not protect anyone's privacy unless the recipients believe it was set by a real human being, with a real preference for privacy over personalization.

Microsoft deliberately violates the standard. They made a big deal about announcing that very fact. Microsoft are members of the Tracking Protection working group and are fully informed of these facts. They are fully capable of requesting a change to the standard, but have chosen not to do so. The decision to set DNT by default in IE10 has nothing to do with the user's privacy. Microsoft knows full well that the false signal will be ignored, and thus prevent their own users from having an effective option for DNT even if their users want one. You can figure out why they want that. If you have a problem with it, choose a better browser.

If there’s a problem with Fielding’s stance, however, it's that the W3C DNT draft does not tell browser makers how they should implement DNT. Reg regular Tim Anderson also points out here that the section on user choice was added to a section of the draft after the consumer preview of Windows 8 from Microsoft on 29 February.

The section in question reads: “Key to that notion of expression is that it MUST reflect the user's preference, not the preference of some institutional or network-imposed mechanism outside the user's control.”

Also, somewhat controversially, Fielding has updated the code of millions of servers to not accept the privacy settings of the browser in Windows 8 silently, without apparently notifying the world or seeking its approval.

The response, needless to say, has been both explosive and polemical. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Not appy with your Chromebook? Well now it can run Android apps
Google offers beta of tricky OS-inside-OS tech
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
NHS grows a NoSQL backbone and rips out its Oracle Spine
Open source? In the government? Ha ha! What, wait ...?
Google extends app refund window to two hours
You now have 120 minutes to finish that game instead of 15
Intel: Hey, enterprises, drop everything and DO HADOOP
Big Data analytics projected to run on more servers than any other app
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.