Feeds

Intel rolls eyes at flaccid PC biz, cuts $1bn off expected sales

Wall St warned of Q3 revenue downsize

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Well, it looks like the Intel Developer Forum might be a bit more subdued next week than usual, with the chipmaker cutting its revenue projections for the third quarter, which ends this month.

In a statement announced before Wall Street opened this morning, Chipzilla warned investors that its sales in the third quarter would be between $12.9bn and $13.5bn, down from the $13.8bn to $14.8bn it had been projecting. That's somewhere between $900m and $1.3bn in lost revenues.

With PC sales slumping in part because of slowing economic growth in parts of Europe and Asia and skittishness in the United States and elsewhere, Wall Street had already been anticipating that Intel would not hit the high-end of the range. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had told the markets that they had expected Intel to rake in $14.21bn, but this seems a bit lower than anyone was anticipating.

You can blame tablets and slack demand for Ultrabook alternatives for more than a little of Intel's woes, but you can't blame servers, storage, and switching.

"Relative to the prior forecast, the company is seeing customers reducing inventory in the supply chain versus the normal growth in third-quarter inventory; softness in the enterprise PC market segment; and slowing emerging market demand," Intel said in its statement. "The data center business is meeting expectations."

In conjunction with the revenue cut, Intel also trimmed its gross margin expectations for the third quarter by one point and now says gross margins across all products will be 62 per cent, plus or minus 1 per cent. Intel added that it was backing off on capital spending a bit for 2012 and would now come in at the low-end of its range of $12.1bn to $12.9bn in cash outlays for the year on fabs and wafer-baking gear. Intel said that it would be re-using some of its gear to push down to the 14 nanometer node to save cash.

Intel will report its third quarter financials on October 16. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Premier League wants to PURGE ALL FOOTIE GIFs from social media
Not paying Murdoch? You're gonna get a right LEGALLING - thanks to automated software
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer quits Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.