Qubes OS bakes in virty system-level security
Blue Pill creator stacks multiple sandboxed VMs
Invisible Things Lab (ITL), a group of security researchers based in Warsaw, Poland, has announced Qubes 1.0, the first production release of a new desktop operating system designed to provide unprecedented security through the pervasive use of virtualization.
"Unfortunately, contrary to common belief, there are no general purpose, desktop OSes, that would be formally proven to be secure," ITL founder and CEO Joanna Rutkowska wrote in a blog post announcing the release on Monday. "At the very best," she said, "there are some parts that are formally verified, such as some microkernels, but not whole OSes."
To help rectify that situation, Rutkowska and her team built Qubes, an OS that uses virtual machines (VMs) to isolate sensitive applications and their data from parts of the system that may be vulnerable to compromise.
Qubes wasn't written from scratch, but instead draws upon existing open source components, although it uses them in new ways. At its heart is the Xen hypervisor, which it uses to create and manage the various VMs that form its security model.
In Qubes, users can create as many VMs – also known as domains – as they want, and assign them varying security levels based on the sensitivity of the applications and data they will be using in them. For example, one user might decide to create "home", "work", "banking", and "shopping" domains, each shielded from the others and each with its own security policies.
Below all of these application domains, Qubes maintains a separate administrative domain that provides a common GUI for all of the running applications. No matter which domains the various applications might be running under, they can all share the desktop on the same screen, and share the same input devices.
A Qubes desktop running VMs at various security levels marked green, yellow, and red (click to enlarge)
That doesn't mean they can share data, however. The user has ultimate control over which files and other data can pass between which domains. Even operations as simple as cut-and-paste between domains aren't allowed without explicit user approval.
Qubes can also enforce network policies for each domain, both to prevent unwanted network activity by malware and to block commonplace user mistakes. For example, a user might configure Qubes so that only a web browser running in the banking domain can access online banking sites, while browsers running in other domains are blocked from those sites.
Qubes can even create "disposable VMs" for one-time actions that could compromise security even though they would ordinarily be allowed. For example, a user could choose to open a PDF file from a suspicious source in a disposable VM, minimizing the potential damage it could cause if the file contained exploit code.
Rutkowska cautions that, particularly in this early phase, Qubes shouldn't be considered a "safe" OS, but rather a "reasonably secure" one. That's because despite all of the layers of security built into the Qubes security model, the security it provides is not automatic. Instead, it relies on the user to make decisions, which Rutkowska admits won't be the right approach for everyone.
"This provides for great flexibility for more advanced users," she writes, "but the price to pay is that Qubes OS requires some skills and thinking to actually make the user's data more secure."
Rutkowska also warns that there may yet be bugs in the Qubes code that could be used to compromise its security model. She should know. In 2006, she made a name for herself in the security community by creating Blue Pill, a rootkit based on the hardware virtualization support features found in modern AMD and Intel processors.
Users who would like to try out the new OS can do so by downloading an ISO and following the instructions on the Qubes website. For those who would like to try to crack Qubes' security, on the other hand, Rutkowska says bring it on. ®
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
COMMENTS
Re: This existed in 2001
If you read more about the security architecture of Qubes I think you'll find that the similarities don't run past cosmetics. GreenBorder was for sandboxing - along the lines of Sandboxie, with the segmentation happening on top of the OS.
Qubes is a different beast all together - with the segmentation happening at the hypervisor level, enforced by hardware level controls, etc.
That's not to say that "[Qubes rulez and GreenBorder is teh suxorz]"... A lot of what Qubes protects against seems to be more theoretical than actual, and I have no reason to doubt the effectiveness of solutions like Sandboxie, but I have been following the Qubes project for quite a while now... even if just as a bit of academic fascination.
Re: "Based on Xen, X Window System, and Linux"
Huh. T'was an honest question, if somewhat provocative, and I get no replies but some kind of pavlovian downvote. Microsoft hates Linux, is currently waging (a losing) patent war against it, and Qubes OS is partly based on Linux. Just to really rattle the hornet's nest, they are working on Windows compatibility.
So.. when does the demand for a hundred bajillion dollars for violation of 235 patents appear on the doorstep of Invisible Things Lab?
Re: This existed in 2001
Wow - Dear editor, how about a review of Sandboxie and Bitbox.
Probably more positive than yet more tems about latest crack of Java, Browsers etc ad nauseum.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM Implementer’s Checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner