The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Cleversafe: Our mad rig can gobble A TERABYTE in A SECOND

Big Data? This is Giant Fat Chair-smashing Bastard Data

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

Cleversafe claims it has the biggest mouth for objects on the planet, gulping them in at a terabyte a second.

The company is an object storage startup and its 3000 series of appliances can cram in a terabyte's worth of objects but you need a thousand, yes indeed, 1,000, ingest boxes or Accesser 3100 storage router appliances in front if a 10EB storage cloud to do it.

The Accessers read and write objects into the object storage namespace independently and each one sucks in data at a rate of 1GB/sec.

A 10EB storage cloud is not just a Big Data installation; it is an effing gigantic data installation comprising:-

- 16 sites
- 24 portable datacenters per site (384 total)
- 21 racks per portable datacenter (8,064 total)
- 147 storage nodes (Slicestors) per portable datacenter (56,448 total)
- 84 3TB drive per Slicestor (4.7M drives total)
- 1000 Accesser 3100 appliances (1GB/s per appliance, 1TB/s total ingest)
- 96 dsNet Manager 3100 appliances (each manages 100PB of infrastructure)

This is steroidal, pump-up-the-numbers marketing. As if anybody would ever put 4.7 million disk drives in 56,448 Slicestors in 8,060 racks in 16 datacentres. It's hugely impressive - but like a theoretical orgasm for object storage buffs.

A 1TB/sec ingest rate is similar to high-performance computing data ingest rates - DataDirect Network's SFA12ke claims a 20GB/sec file ingest rate per rack - but this isn't an HPC situation, not when spread across 16 sites. It basically seems to take quite a lot of time to ingest and store unstructured information into the Cleversafe object store, as each object needs to have a hash calculated; there's a fair amount of processing involved.

The object storage vendors say their technology is better at storing billions of files across dispersed sites than a traditional file system. When we see one of them doing just that we will all be impressed. Until then it's just modelling and the real thing is always better than a model. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Latest Comments

Tens

Tens of petabytes in a single production system, definitely real today with several Cleversafe customers (first hand knowledge). Tens of exabytes in production, not that far off given the growth of data and the need to keep more available and online for analysis. Challenge is to make sure you have an architecture and a platform that can get there when your organization needs you to be there.

0
0

DataDomain?

I work for EMC, trust me, the sort of workload this science project fantasy is talking about would hardly be put onto a (100's of) DataDomain(s). Atmos could scale to these numbers and beyond though.

Speculating is fun though, 60EB is about 1/30 of the total amount of digital content generated in 2011 from what IDC estimates, so go ahead and triple those numbers and there is some room for growth :)

0
0

Sure

Prove it.......

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
AMD lifts the veil on Opteron, ARM chip plans for 2014
Not much action going on in 2013, though
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches