The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

The dead reanimates as HP ships Open webOS beta

Meg's boys are also hiring webOS developers. Curious...

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

As promised, HP has shipped the beta release of Open webOS, the open source version of the web standards–based webOS mobile platform that was the last hurrah of the former Palm before HP absorbed it in 2010. More surprisingly, however, HP actually seems to be staffing up its webOS development team – an odd reversal of recent trends.

HP first detailed its schedule for the ambitious open source project in January, and so far it has managed to hit each milestone. With the beta version arriving on schedule, it seems reasonable to expect that Open webOS 1.0 will ship in September as planned.

The beta release is intended primarily for developers. It includes 54 webOS components totaling more than 450,000 lines of code, HP's webOS team explained in a blog post, and it provides developers with two separate build environments.

The desktop build is meant to be the primary development environment for improving the webOS experience itself. It runs on Ubuntu Linux, and as of the beta release it includes support for many applications, including the core webOS applications such as Calendar and Contacts, and also some third-party apps.

The mobile build is for hardware hackers who would like to see webOS running on new devices. It's based on the OpenEmbedded build framework and includes an ARM emulator that can run core webOS services. The team says it is working on a more advanced image for a future release that can boot to the full webOS experience.

In all, the beta is a generous gift to the open source community. The question is, however, who will use it? Among HP Touchpad owners, much of the recent excitement has been about wiping webOS from the devices and installing Android, an OS that would appear to have a much more promising future.

But webOS might not be down for the count just yet. Curiously, HP's jobs site lists more than 20 software engineering, project management, and design positions related to the platform, in both HP's Sunnyvale headquarters and its Shanghai, China location.

That might seem strange, considering that HP fired half of its webOS team in February. But new ideas seem to have been brewing since then. Industry scuttlebutt says HP has spun off its webOS division into a new and mysterious subsidiary company, called Gram.

HP still has not made a public announcement about Gram, but its job listings do seem to confirm that the subsidiary at least exists, even if they remain vague about what it aims to achieve. As one job posting reads:

We are a fast-paced startup with big ideas, talented people, the software assets of Palm and backed by HP. We built a new company to get the best of both worlds: small teams, fun and disruptive projects, with fast execution backed by HP for long-term success and disruption in the industry ...

In this role you will develop groundbreaking mobile products, working with a cross-functional team from product conception to ship date to define the interfaces that millions will use every day.

Your Reg hack leaves it to you, dear reader, to ponder just what that might mean. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Re: proprietary -> opensource -> dead

You must be a fan of XML, or written another way, a

<fan>

<of>

<writing>

<everything>

<twice>

</twice>

</everything>

</writing>

</of>

</fan>

8
0
Anonymous Coward

Beware

If you are thinking of going for a job as a WebOS developer don't quit your existing one. Simply turn up for HP on Saturday and the whole team will be made redundant by the Sunday evening,

HP constantly flip flop and that's why they are heading for the gutter

5
0

Re: not waving, but drowning

Oh look, the mad downvoters are back.

I agree, it is hard to decide what the fundamental problem was with HP & the WebOS devices:

* Why did a dyed-in-the-wool MS shop (at the retail level) think it could handle another OS?

* Why did the devices take so long to dribble out?

* Why were they so ineffably poor (no memory slot, no USB master mode), no product differentiation?

* Why did they think they could pitch them at the iPod price point?

* Why slash and burn like you had a tantrum?

Considering what they paid for it, I too would expect Meg to be trying to find some value in the wreckage.

This is the company that was going to ship every PC with desktop Webos, and then forgot about that bit. Even with the change of leadership I reckon the rot goes all the way down.

4
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
Apple: iOS7 dayglo Barbie makeover is UNFINISHED - report
Plus: You don't like the icons? Blame marketing
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry