Feeds

Three beds Samsung for its own LTE mobe broadband kit

Huawei's advance misses a beat

New hybrid storage solutions

Samsung will be supplying Three's 4G network, squashing ideas that the network-sharing deal with EE would simply be extended and giving Samsung a significant foothold in an increasingly competitive market.

Samsung will provide the Radio Access Network, and the core infrastructure, for Three's LTE (4G) network. That includes the base stations, and radio core, which will start testing later this year with a view to switching on during 2013, just as soon as EE can be convinced to clear out of the frequencies needed.

The deal is the first European-infrastructure contract for Samsung, a relative newcomer to what used to be a cosy oligopoly, but is equally important to Three as it signifies that the UK's smallest operator intends to build its own 4G network rather than extending the current network-sharing arrangement with EE.

Three shares a 3G network with the UK's largest network operator Everything Everywhere, which has been busy deploying LTE kit from Huawei to take advantage of its monopoly on 4G in the UK. The assumption was that this sharing deal would simply be extended to include LTE, especially given Three's purchase of EE's excessive holdings at 1800MHz – which will make them neighbours, spectrally speaking.

But it's obviously not to be, and Three will have its very own network for 4G. Initial testing and deployment will likely be in that 1800MHz band, but Three would be foolish not to be deploying equipment capable of working in the 800MHz and 2.5GHz bands which are coming up for auction next year.

Three might not be sharing a 4G network with EE, but the base stations will probably still co-locate with its former partner as in most cases new equipment will go into the existing sites. EE still isn't saying where its sites are, and refusing to explain why, but it's unlikely that 4G will see many new locations for either operator, as there's no great incentive to extend coverage. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Blockbuster book lays out the first 20 years of the Smartphone Wars
Symbian's David Wood bares all. Not for the faint hearted
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
Apple Watch will CONQUER smartwatch world – analysts
After Applelocalypse, other wristputers will get stuck in
Shades of Mannesmann: Vodafone should buy T-Mobile US
Biting the bullet would let Blighty-based biz flip the bird at AT&T
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
Net neutrality fans' joy as '2.3 million email' flood hits US Congress
FCC invites opinions in CSV format, after Slowdown day 'success'
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.