Feeds

Melb IT tells ICANN to clear up its clearinghouse act

Brands in GTLD cybersquat peril

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

ICANN’s trademark clearinghouse guidelines for the introduction of gTLDs have been slammed by one of Australia’s largest domain registrars, Melbourne IT.

Melbourne IT has warned that high profile trademark holders will be vulnerable to attack from cyber squatters and counterfeiters unless policy is swiftly changed.

In a new discussion paper, ‘Minimizing HARM‘, Melbourne IT said that under the current regime brands would be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars, as a defensive measure, to register their trademarks under each new generic gTLD to protect their brand from fraud or consumer confusion.

"In a new gTLD world, organizations will still need to be more proactive in monitoring for online infringements, that is not going to disappear; but what we are asking ICANN for is a stronger process to increase consumer protection by shielding high at-risk names that are regularly abused by cybersquatters, phishers and counterfeiters online. ICANN's current guidelines and initiatives to protect trademark holders do not go far enough," said Melbourne IT CEO and MD, Theo Hnarakis.

The paper suggests a raft of measures to protect HARM (High At-Risk Trademarks) including the creation of a list of HARMs, which will give those brands greater protection and the introduction of ‘sunrise privileges’ which will allow brands to pay a one-off blocking fee to register the name, waiving any on-going renewal fees. It also recommends the implementation of a rapid take down procedure - within 48 hours of a Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) complaint- unless a Response Fee is paid equivalent to the URS fee paid by the complainant.

The findings from Melbourne IT’s discussion paper will be presented to the ICANN community for consideration at ICANN's Toronto meeting in October. Melbourne IT will also hold a working group summit in Washington D.C. on September 18th to further discuss the proposal and the issues it raises.

®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ice cream headache as black hat hacks sack Dairy Queen
I scream, you scream, we all scream 'DATA BREACH'!
Goog says patch⁵⁰ your Chrome
64-bit browser loads cat vids FIFTEEN PERCENT faster!
NIST to sysadmins: clean up your SSH mess
Too many keys, too badly managed
JLaw, Kate Upton exposed in celeb nude pics hack
100 women victimised as Apple iCloud accounts reportedly popped
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
Researchers camouflage haxxor traps with fake application traffic
Honeypots sweetened to resemble actual workloads, complete with 'secure' logins
Attack flogged through shiny-clicky social media buttons
66,000 users popped by malicious Flash fudging add-on
New Snowden leak: How NSA shared 850-billion-plus metadata records
'Federated search' spaffed info all over Five Eyes chums
Three quarters of South Korea popped in online gaming raids
Records used to plunder game items, sold off to low lifes
Oz fed police in PDF redaction SNAFU
Give us your metadata, we'll publish your data
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.