Feeds

Melb IT tells ICANN to clear up its clearinghouse act

Brands in GTLD cybersquat peril

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

ICANN’s trademark clearinghouse guidelines for the introduction of gTLDs have been slammed by one of Australia’s largest domain registrars, Melbourne IT.

Melbourne IT has warned that high profile trademark holders will be vulnerable to attack from cyber squatters and counterfeiters unless policy is swiftly changed.

In a new discussion paper, ‘Minimizing HARM‘, Melbourne IT said that under the current regime brands would be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars, as a defensive measure, to register their trademarks under each new generic gTLD to protect their brand from fraud or consumer confusion.

"In a new gTLD world, organizations will still need to be more proactive in monitoring for online infringements, that is not going to disappear; but what we are asking ICANN for is a stronger process to increase consumer protection by shielding high at-risk names that are regularly abused by cybersquatters, phishers and counterfeiters online. ICANN's current guidelines and initiatives to protect trademark holders do not go far enough," said Melbourne IT CEO and MD, Theo Hnarakis.

The paper suggests a raft of measures to protect HARM (High At-Risk Trademarks) including the creation of a list of HARMs, which will give those brands greater protection and the introduction of ‘sunrise privileges’ which will allow brands to pay a one-off blocking fee to register the name, waiving any on-going renewal fees. It also recommends the implementation of a rapid take down procedure - within 48 hours of a Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) complaint- unless a Response Fee is paid equivalent to the URS fee paid by the complainant.

The findings from Melbourne IT’s discussion paper will be presented to the ICANN community for consideration at ICANN's Toronto meeting in October. Melbourne IT will also hold a working group summit in Washington D.C. on September 18th to further discuss the proposal and the issues it raises.

®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Webcam hacker pervs in MASS HOME INVASION
You thought you were all alone? Nope – change your password, says ICO
You really need to do some tech support for Aunty Agnes
Free anti-virus software, expires, stops updating and p0wns the world
USB coding anarchy: Consider all sticks licked
Thumb drive design ruled by almighty buck
Attack reveals 81 percent of Tor users but admins call for calm
Cisco Netflow a handy tool for cheapskate attackers
Privacy bods offer GOV SPY VICTIMS a FREE SPYWARE SNIFFER
Looks for gov malware that evades most antivirus
Patch NOW! Microsoft slings emergency bug fix at Windows admins
Vulnerability promotes lusers to domain overlords ... oops
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Getting ahead of the compliance curve
Learn about new services that make it easy to discover and manage certificates across the enterprise and how to get ahead of the compliance curve.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.