Feeds

Oz regulator says crowdfunding must obey financial rules

Analyst says ASIC "risks destroying" crowdfunding

The essential guide to IT transformation

Kickstarter kicked Australia's financial services regulator, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), has run its eye over crowdfunding services and decided some effectively issue securities under Australian law.

“Depending on the particular crowd funding arrangement, ASIC's view is that some types of crowd funding could involve offering or advertising a financial product, providing a financial service or fundraising through securities requiring a complying disclosure document,” ASIC Commissioner, Greg Tanzer said in a guidance note published today.

Those planning to offer crowdfunding services therefore need to lawyer up, the guidance suggests, lest they fail to meet the many obligations imposed on those who sell financial services products and securities. Failure to meet those obligations can mean colossal fines.

The Commission also offers some blunt-ish warnings for operators of crowdfunding sites, suggesting they protect consumers by conducting background checks on project creators, requiring them to provide details on just how and when they will deliver promised goods and services and holding investments in a trust fund.

Consumers are another target, with the Commission also publishing advice on things to consider before investing in crowdfunding. Perhaps ominously, that advice suggests using credit cards to make a crowdfunding payment may not be an entirely sensible idea.

The advice does at least end on a happy-ish note:

Supporting a project you really believe in can be a rewarding experience but you need to be careful someone isn’t taking advantage of your generosity.

Futurist Ross Dawson's first reaction to ASIC's guidance was that it represents bad news.

"ASIC is in great danger of stifling a thing that could be of great benefit to the economy," he said. "We do need regulation but this looks heavy handed." Dawson has since blogged about the ASIC guidance, and suggests ASIC "risks destroying" the fundraising technique if it makes viability assessments compulsory.®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
Facebook to let stalkers unearth buried posts with mobe search
Prepare to HAUNT your pal's back catalogue
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.