Feeds

Jimbo Wales: Wikipedia servers in UK? No way, not with YOUR libel law

Britain's silly rules cause too much friction, he tells London

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Jimmy Wales has claimed that he couldn't have founded Wikipedia in the UK because the nation's libel law adds unpredictability and "friction" to hosting the world's largest unreliable collection of factoids.

It's an echo of the notorious claim made by Prime Minister David Cameron that Google could not have started out in the UK due to its protection of copyrighted works - a suggestion even Number 10 can't now corroborate. But Wales' proclamation is something else, too: a tacit admission that some of the material published by Wikipedia is legally contentious.

There certainly are good, thoughtful contributors at Wikipedia, yet huge swathes of material – encompassing biographies of living people – are governed by anonymous fanatics with an axe to grind.

Wales, Wikipedia's Maximum Leader, was speaking at the London House debates at City Hall. Wales said Wikipedia doesn't operate web servers in the UK due to the nation's strict laws on publishing defamatory material and the severe financial penalties involved. Placing the hardware in Blighty could put the website's administrators firmly under UK jurisdiction.

Screenshot of a tweet that reads: Stay out of our way so we can build a future! Well said Jimmy!

Someone agrees with Jimbo!

Wales also spoke of his previous projects, a list that includes his ad-flogging "adult" biz Bomis that sank without a trace. (It takes a particular kind of entrepreneurial genius to fail to make money from web filth.)

Now he's a UK resident, Jimmy Wales is a ubiquitous keynote technology speaker at London gabfests. Organisers must surely have his name pre-printed on the e-vites – alongside the advice "Don't mention Bomis!"

Fortunately, there were two excellent responders among the eight people invited to debate with Wales.

Dean Bubley, of Disruptive Analysis, reminded Wales where Britons' strengths lie and argued that it makes sense to encourage what we're good at: music, TV, media and software, for example – and called for a "corridor" of investment linking the real technology hub of Cambridge with London's media wankers leaders.

Bubley also pointed out that there isn't much silicon in Silicon Roundabout, the capital's collection of tech-related startups.

Alan Patrick, of Broadstuff, also had some observations, and a question or two. "I am still sitting here wondering why someone - anyone - in the UK didn't do something like this [Wikipedia], even if it became an heroic failure," he asked. Patrick added that a typical successful British "startup" is a world-class rock band, not a social media engagement boutique.

In fact, Britain has had several online encyclopaedia projects that anyone can contribute to. One is the Knowhere Guide, which has been online since 1994. It is archived at the British Library, but doesn't have a Wikipedia entry. Another general-purpose effort is the H2G2 encyclopaedia. Both have trundled happily along for years.

Colbert on Wikipedia last year

Colbert on Wikipedia from 2006

Which is fascinating and raises a different set of questions. We can see that Britain does have wiki-style distributed user-contributed projects. However, what it doesn't have is a "Wikipedia Cult": our collaborative projects don't have utopian aspirations, and don't claim to save the world. Ours aren't given utopian status by slack-jawed journalists, pundits, management consultants and gabfest organisers. Ours don't have a Messianic leader; Wales styles himself as Wikipedia's "spiritual leader". You could make the case that the British projects are Wikipedia done properly – without The Bullshit.

The British projects are typically British: careful, empirical and modest; the notion that you can establish truth through consensus is regarded as a remarkably silly one, here.

So Wikipedia's problems may be specifically Wikipedian. The bombast, the claim to authority, and the hungry desire for adulation may be the same reason it attracts such peculiar and problematic characters, and the reason it appears to do a poor job of dealing with them. Wikipedia has grave institutional difficulties cleaning up its mess.

Last week, the chairman of Wikimedia UK (a charity that dishes out Wikipedia donations) resigned after an elected committee of senior Wiki editors banned him from contributing to the English encyclopaedia. The group alleged that he had made a "highly inappropriate" edit to a biography page that added a link to pornography. The administrator had previously been banned from Wikipedia for editing biographies of living people - but had later been allowed to return.

While Wales lectures London, perhaps it should be the other way around. He has a lot to learn. At the very least, Wales ought want to put his own house in order, first, before lecturing his hosts. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Net neutrality protestors slam the brakes on their OWN websites
Sites link up to protest slow lanes by bogging down pages
Blockbuster book lays out the first 20 years of the Smartphone Wars
Symbian's David Wood bares all. Not for the faint hearted
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
Who us, SHARE infrastructure? Networks reject gov proposal
Execs pour scorn on 'national roaming' outline – report
Net neutrality fans' joy as '2.3 million email' flood hits US Congress
FCC invites opinions in CSV format, after Slowdown day 'success'
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
Apple Watch will CONQUER smartwatch world – analysts
After Applelocalypse, other wristputers will get stuck in
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.