Feeds

EMC: We're turning VMAX into mainframe tape KILLER

Who needs physical when you can have virtual?

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

EMC has turned its VMAX array into a mainframe virtual tape library – the DLm8000, with synchronous replication – in a move that could see tapes banished from mainframe operations.

The company last year bought Bus-Tech, a mainframe virtual tape library vendor. EMC has a range of Disk Library for mainframe (DLm) products, including the DLM1000 entry-level system using Data Domain as its disk storage backend; the DLm2000 and DLm6000 enterprise products; and now the DLm8000 using VMAX, EMC's high-end storage array, as the backend storage and SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility) for synchronous replication. Synchronous replication gets new data to a second recovery system in the fastest way and shortens recovery times for failed systems.

EMC says that z/OS mainframe customers can have tighter recovery point objectives (RPO) and recovery time objectives (RTO) by using the DLm8000. The thinking is that banking, brokerage and insurance companies with transaction-based applications, where time and data accuracy are both critical, will need sync replication to prevent any main site disaster from causing data loss.

The DLm8000 can have up to 1.7PB of VMAX capacity and delivers up to 2.7GB/sec throughput. There can be 16 FICON attachments and 2.048 emulated tape drives. It comes with a EMC z/OS Storage Manager (EzSM), which provides a mainframe view of storage with VMAX monitoring and DLm management to discover and monitor DLm devices, import and export tapes and all the other stuff admins need to do. The screenshot shows just how little mainframe admin screens have changed over the years.

DLm8000 screenshot

DLM EzSM screenshot.

Part of EMC's pitch is that this single product covers tape use for Hierarchical Storage Management, work tapes, backup tapes and archive tapes. Bluntly, it enables "the complete removal of physical tape from the mainframe environment enabled".

This echoes the "Tape sucks" message EMC was putting out last year, although this has been modified a little, with EMC saying it will supply tape libraries to customers that must have them.

The DLm8000 will be available in the last quarter of this year. No pricing information was supplied. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.