The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds
  • print
  • alert

Sample Stills and ISO Tests

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 3200 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 100 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 1600 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 400 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 200 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 6400 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 400 – Click for a full-resolution crop

Nikon D4 full-frame 16Mp DSLR camera

ISO 200 – Click for a full-resolution crop

ISO Tests

Reg Hardware Nikon D4 ISO tests

Click to download zipped ISO 100-204,800 test files (175MB)

Anonymous Coward

Re: How much?

"The F4 in 1989 was about £1200 or about £1900 today"

Not sure about those figures, using the calculator here:

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1633409/Historic-inflation-calculator-value-money-changed-1900.html

£1200 in 1989 looks more like £4000 today - much closer to the price of the D4

6
0

Re: How much? @Glesga

"digital has extra costs related to post-production that can be difficult to sell to a client,"

To be honest thats a ridiculous statement. There is no reason why you need to do post processing on digital any more than you do on film. The reason why you tend to do post processing on digital is its easier and cheaper giving you the ability to give a photo a big lift with 5 mins of work while you probably wouldnt have bothered on film.

8
2

Re: How much?

Well you just going to have to get the cheaper model then arent you. Canon 1D counterpart isnt cheap either.

The question is whether you need or want it. The 11 fps shooting is amazing but it depends to what type of photography you do. You wont need it for portrait, landscape, weddings , etc. Journalism , sport and animal would of course benefit . So grab the D800?

5
0

Re: How much? @Glesga

Oh, but there is a need to do post. While film tends to have a character of its own, the digital files (in pro cameras at least) try to be as neutral as possible, leaving you more latitude for post, which is exactly why you HAVE to do post (even if it's just a general curves, saturation and sharpness adjustment).

I know that in most cases, I fine-tune the exposure manually in post (Yes, I'm the kind of loser who's often off by 1/3 of a stop, if not more. I know, I wouldn't last a day back in the, erm, day.), then just apply a nice curve/sharpening/sat preset of my own making, and well, Bob's your uncle. Not a lot of work required, but FAR more control than with film.

4
0

Drool....

If you're a pro, then seensible tax planning makes the cost less problematic.

Unless you've got the wrong accountant.

4
0

More from The Register

Android is a mess and needs sprucing up, admits chief
Can Google really fix it? It isn't in control any more
New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Android device? Ooohhhh, you mean a Samsung phone
Koreans nabbed nearly all the Q1 profits – more even than Google
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
Report: AT&T dropping Facebook phone after dismal sales
Turns out folks won't buy that for a dollar