Feeds

HDS to flaunt young HUS array for money

Needs to stop sequential sliding of revenues

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

HDS quarterly revenues are slipping down and need the recently launched Hitachi Unified Storage array to ramp sales and reverse the slide.

In its first fiscal 2012 quarter, HDS recorded $1.047bn revenues from storage sales by itself and Hitachi in Japan. (This figure does not include OEM sales such those to HP.) This is a record but just 2 per cent up on a year ago, and 7.7 per cent down on the preceding quarter, which was itself 6.5 per cent lower than the quarter before that.

HDS quarterly revenues to Q1 fy2012

HDS, a Hitachi group subsidiary, does not release profit or loss figures.

The recent slide is due to weak Adaptable Modular Storage (AMS) array sales, and to adverse economic conditions in southern Europe. HDS has replaced the AMS array with the HUS unified file, block and object storage array and is hoping that its sales will reverse the mid-range decline.

There were plenty of bright spots in the HDS results picture; the Americas' revenues grew 4 per cent, Asia-Pacific revs grew 9 per cent, and EMEA let the side down with a 6 per cent dip.

High-end VSP array sales increased 30 per cent year-on-year. We understand that there will be VSP-related announcements later this month which may extend the VSP addressable market. There was growth in the high 70 per cent range for HDS's file and content services products. The HDS NAS platform, which includes the acquired Blue Arc technology, grew more than a 100 per cent year-on-year and we should see the Blue Arc technology appearing in more HDS products.

Roberto Basilio, HDS VP for hardware product marketing, said HDS has won business through managed services – the new name for outsourcing – as customer IT management begins to look on the idea of getting out of running their own IT more favourably. He said that the idea of converged systems is gaining traction, though there is a wide spread between the fully integrated single systems like the Oracle Exa-products and template directions for converging components like EMC's VSPEX and NetApp's FlexPods, with VCE occupying a middle ground.

Basilio handles Hitachi storage, servers and networking hardware, and said he is cognisant of the trend to move performance data storage into a flash tier and simultaneously move it closer to the servers where the apps that need that data execute.

He didn't quite say "Watch this space," but I feel we should keep a watchful eye on it anyway. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.