Feeds

Microsoft bundles BlueHat finalist tech into anti-exploit tool

Give 'em enough ROPe

The essential guide to IT transformation

Microsoft has beefed up one of its anti-exploit tools with technology from a $200K contest finalist.

Technology from a BlueHat Prize finalist Ivan Fratric, designed to mitigate attacks that leverage Return Oriented Programming (ROP), has already been incorporated into Redmond's Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET) 3.5 Technology Preview, released on Wednesday.

Fratric, a doctorate computer science researcher at the University of Zagreb in Croatia, developed ROPGuard to thwart attacks based on ROP, a hacker technique that involves combining short pieces of benign code for a malicious purpose. "ROPGuard defines a set of checks that can be used to detect when certain functions are being called in the context of malicious ROP code" thereby protecting against attacks based on exploiting memory corruption vulnerabilities, Microsoft explains.

The EMET toolkit offers features to fine-tune enterprise configuration as well as event logging technology that permits real-time notification of exploitation attempts, among other functions.

The BlueHat Prize competition, which is aimed at nurturing innovation in exploit mitigations – by handing out more than $250,000 in cash and prizes as bait – was launched by Microsoft a year ago at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas.

All three finalists in the blue Hat competition have developed ROP exploits blockers of one type or another, with the best rated due to land the $200,000 first prize.

Online interviews with the trio can be found here.

Microsoft is due to announce the inaugural BlueHat Prize grand prize winner at its "researcher appreciation party" in Las Vegas later today, when the three finalists will find out which of them has bagged the top $200k prize. The runner-up gets $50k and third place gets an MSDN subscription valued at $10k).

In related news, Microsoft Security Response Centre released its annual report (PDF) on Wednesday. The progress report looks at how Redmond investigates third-party vulnerabilities and coordinates the release of security updates through Microsoft Vulnerability Research (MSVR), among other things.

The MSVR program reported 96 vulnerabilities to 39 different vendors over the last year. The 33-page progress report focuses on stats about bulletins and bug fixes since 2006. ®

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Snowden on NSA's MonsterMind TERROR: It may trigger cyberwar
Plus: Syria's internet going down? That was a US cock-up
Who needs hackers? 'Password1' opens a third of all biz doors
GPU-powered pen test yields more bad news about defences and passwords
e-Borders fiasco: Brits stung for £224m after US IT giant sues UK govt
Defeat to Raytheon branded 'catastrophic result'
Microsoft cries UNINSTALL in the wake of Blue Screens of Death™
Cache crash causes contained choloric calamity
Germany 'accidentally' snooped on John Kerry and Hillary Clinton
Dragnet surveillance picks up EVERYTHING, USA, m'kay?
Linux kernel devs made to finger their dongles before contributing code
Two-factor auth enabled for Kernel.org repositories
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.