Feeds

Compare the Market loses .XXX smut-squat appeal

It's not that simples, is it?

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Meerkat-obsessed Compare the Market, which became the first company to lose a cybersquatting complaint over a .xxx domain name, has lost its appeal against the ruling.

BGL Group, which owns the Compare The Market brand, lost its first case against the owner of comparethemarket.xxx in May, after a Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) panel decided that the term “compare the market” was just too generic to result in a finding of cybersquatting.

At that time, panelist Mike Rodenbaugh ruled: "'[C]ompare the market' could relate to myriad different types of markets and myriad different comparisons."

But BGL, which owns a trademark on the phrase "Compare the Market", filed another complaint with the CAC a week later, essentially appealing the first ruling. That complaint has now been thrown out of court on procedural grounds.

The company is still unique among porn-squatted brands; of the 27 .xxx cybersquatting cases handled under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy this year, the other 25 have resulted in the domain being transferred to the complaining trademark holder.

Gwent resident Jon Watkins registered comparethemarket.xxx last December, shortly after .xxx domains became broadly available for public purchase, according to the latest UDRP ruling.

The fact that he used a privacy service to register the domain – shielding his name and location from public view – was used by BGL as grounds to appeal.

The company argued that had it known first time around that Watkins was a UK resident, its case that he should have been aware of the Compare the Market brand would have been much stronger.

Compare the Market is almost universally famous in the UK for its TV commercials, which use a computer generated comedy meerkat spokesperson.

But the Czech Arbitration Court panel – this time a three-person panel – rejected BGL's appeal on the basis that the company had failed to bring any new evidence to the table. The original panelist, it decided, had already considered the fact that Watkins is a UK resident.

If there was a silver lining for BGL, it was that the panel decided that its complaint did not amount to Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

It's almost unheard of for companies to file three UDRP proceedings against the same person over the same domain name. If BGL is set on owning comparethemarket.xxx, it's probably going to have to pay off its current owner, or take him to a proper court. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
EE fails to apologise for HUGE T-Mobile outage that hit Brits on Friday
Customer: 'Please change your name to occasionally somewhere'
Time Warner Cable customers SQUEAL as US network goes offline
A rude awakening: North Americans greeted with outage drama
We need less U.S. in our WWW – Euro digital chief Steelie Neelie
EC moves to shift status quo at Internet Governance Forum
BT customers face broadband and landline price hikes
Poor punters won't be affected, telecoms giant claims
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.