Feeds

Foxconn trumps Apple to sit pretty on Fortune 500

But Apple's profits will take some beating

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Contract manufacturer Foxconn managed to steal a march on its illustrious partner Apple this week after it was ranked several places higher than the fruity toy maker in the latest Fortune Global 500 rankings, with a whopping $117.5bn (£75.7bn) in revenues.

The Taiwanese giant’s parent company Hon Hai Precision Industry was placed 43rd on the annual list of the world’s biggest companies by revenue. Apple, by contrast, sat in 55th spot with $108.2bn (£69.8bn), climbing an impressive 56 places from last year’s list.

When it comes to profits, however, Apple is the clear winner. It managed to generate $25.9bn (£16.7bn) in profits over the period versus Hon Hai’s $2.8bn (£1.8bn).

In fact, Foxconn’s tight profit margins are frequently cited whenever it decides to raise staff wages or invest in improving working conditions as a factor which could force the firm to pass on cost hikes.

So far those fears have been largely allayed, with the firm sacrificing profits in favour of retaining contracts with Apple and others.

It remains to be seen whether the recent deal struck with Apple and the Fair Labor Association over improved working conditions will finally force a change here.

It has agreed to reduce overtime and working hours, increase staff numbers, develop compensation packages for staff and retroactively pay those cheated out of overtime, among other measures which will further eat into profits.

The Fortune 500 list also revealed China’s inexorable rise on the world stage.

The People’s Republic overtook Japan for the first time and now has the second largest number of companies on the list after the US.

China had 73 companies on the list, 12 more than last year, but is still some way behind the US with 132 companies on the list – one fewer than in 2011. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.