Feeds

Cerner questions Epic win for Cambridge patient records

Short-listed supplier queries NHS trust over procurement process

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Patient record supplier Cerner has written to Cambridge University Hospitals foundation trust over its recent award of a major software tender to Epic, Government Computing understands.

The letter, understood to be from Cerner's European managing director Alan Fowles to the trust's interim chief executive Dr Karen Castille, questions the scoring of the rival bids; apparent changes to the procurement process while it was running; and the relative prices of the three short-listed bids from Allscripts, Cerner and Epic.

Reports have suggested that the two losing bids were around £20m, while Epic's winning bid was approximately £30m. Government Computing understands that these figures are broadly accurate.

Fowles' letter, which was also copied to outgoing trust chairman Dame Mary Archer, is believed to question the fact that a short list of three was then increased to six, with Epic one of the new additions. Cambridge is Epic's first significant UK reference site.

A Cambridge University Hospitals spokesman said, "The trust has run an open and fair OJEU competition in line with public procurement processes," said a trust spokesman. "The trust is continuing to proceed with the procurement process for eHospital."

The contract will provide both Cambridge University Hospitals and Papworth Hospital foundation trusts with software for their eHospital project, with HP having won a parallel deal for hardware. This will support the two trusts' new buildings on the Cambridge Biomedical Campus, which involves the University of Cambridge and the Medical Research Council as partners and will incorporate research and education facilities. It will see a doubling of the size of the campus, which will include Cambridge's existing Addenbrooke's site, to 140 acres.

This article was originally published at Guardian Government Computing.

Guardian Government Computing is a business division of Guardian Professional, and covers the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. For updates on public sector IT, join the Government Computing Network here.

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Ex US cybersecurity czar guilty in child sex abuse website case
Health and Human Services IT security chief headed online to share vile images
Uber, Lyft and cutting corners: The true face of the Sharing Economy
Casual labour and tired ideas = not really web-tastic
Don't even THINK about copyright violation, says Indian state
Pre-emptive arrest for pirates in Karnataka
The police are WRONG: Watching YouTube videos is NOT illegal
And our man Corfield is pretty bloody cross about it
Oz biz regulator discovers shared servers in EPIC FACEPALM
'Not aware' that one IP can hold more than one Website
Apple tried to get a ban on Galaxy, judge said: NO, NO, NO
Judge Koh refuses Samsung ban for the third time
Pedals and wheel in that Google robo-car or it's off the road – Cali DMV
And insists on $5 million insurance per motor against accidents
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.