Lookout mulls flagging privacy-invading phone apps as adware
Free virus detector considers crackdown on freebies
Lookout Mobile Security has taken steps towards classifying privacy-eroding phone apps as malign and ripe for removal from devices by its antivirus software.
Many free mobile applications generate revenue by using advertising networks and exchanges to show in-app ads, and in most cases everything is ethical and above board.
However Lookout researchers discovered some of these advertising suppliers quietly access personal information on the phones - including handset owners' email addresses, numbers and names.
"Many of these ad providers also use aggressive mobile ad delivery techniques that can confuse users, like changing bookmark settings or delivering ads outside the context of an individual app," Lookout explains.
19,000 of the 380,000 free apps (5 per cent) analysed by Lookout used questionable or aggressive tactics. On Google Play, apps in the personalisation category (for example, wallpaper apps) have the highest percentage of aggressive ad networks (at 17 per cent), closely followed by comics (13 per cent), arcade & action (10 per cent) and entertainment (8 per cent).
Lookout warns that privacy-invading apps are more prevalent than malware. The security firm has drawn up a list of guidelines on acceptable behaviour for mobile apps, as explained in this blog post.
The firm may later use these guidelines as a benchmark for deciding whether to flag up particular apps as a privacy or security risk to customers of its mobile security software. Lookout, which provides virus detection and elimination software for Apple iOS and Google Android phones, has yet to start classifying any mobile apps as adware.
The US-based biz is in discussion with advertising networks and app developers about the issue in order to thrash out a code of practice.
The draft guidelines cover best practices in the following areas: transparency and clarity of data collection; control over information collected; ad delivery and display behaviour; collection and retention of personal or device-specific data; and secure transport of sensitive data.
"This is a living document that will change as the industry evolves, but ad providers that do not follow the basic requirements could be flagged as adware," Lookout stated (our emphasis).
The company's researchers have drawn attention to an important issue, and their figures are a worthwhile contribution to the debate, but users looking to use its mobile security application as a way to ward off invasive apps will be disappointed, at least for now.
From desktop plagues to mobile menaces
The Ad Network Detector app from Lookout shows what types of ads can be displayed and what personal information is collected by a network. This functionality is there for information purposes only, and it doesn't provide automatic warnings.
Advertising-spewing adware was, of course, a big problem on desktop machines several years ago. Security firms, most notably Kaspersky Lab, successfully fought lawsuits against firms angered that their ad-slinging tech was classified as malign or unwanted. A similar reaction could happen in the mobile arena, hence Lookout's understandable caution.
Lookout said it wanted to equip mobile advertisers and developers with clear privacy and user-experience guidelines so as to "enable growth and innovation in mobile advertising, while protecting user privacy and increasing the trustworthiness of ads".
As well as talking to developers and ad networks, mobile security firms such as Lookout ought to get mobile carriers, regulators and privacy activists involved in tackling the issue. One privacy campaign group is already on board.
Jules Polonetsky, director and co-chair of the Future of Privacy Forum, commented: “For many years, desktop users were plagued with programs that triggered pop-ups, added unwanted toolbars, and changed [web browser] home pages. These guidelines make it clear, while mobile marketing business models and practices are still developing, some practices are out-of-bounds. That’s good news for both consumers and responsible businesses.”
Lookout Mobile Security provides free and paid-for security utilities for phones. The premium version includes a phishing and malicious website blocker, privacy adviser, backup manager, and remote wipe functionality missing from its freebie sibling, which focusses on provides warnings about mobile malware. Lookout boasts 20 million users, the vast majority of whom are assumed to be running freebie versions of its software.
We suspect that the mobile adware warning functionality - as and when it appears - will be sold as a premium service. ®
It is, in part, due to Android's horribly broken permissions system
First up - YOU should be able to tell an app what you are willing to let it do; not the other way around. I have refused to upgrade some of my bundled Orange apps because it wants to "Modify battery statistics". WTF? The latest version builds on this. It is an app to report your contract time/data remaining and modify some options. So why does it want to read SMS? Start at boot? Read contact data? Directly call phone numbers? FOAD! [innocuous app "Orange et moi" by Orange France, with scary permission requests]
Secondly, some of the permissions are lumped together into an awkward mess that brings two barely-related concepts together to represent a huge potential flaw. I present "Read phone state and identity". It is acceptable to read the phone state - you don't want music or video to keep on going when there's a phone call in progress. But why is the UID of the phone lumped into this? Likewise "Full internet access", is there no levels of restriction available?
Maybe where we need to concentrate our shouting is at Google and the Android devs to try to get the permission system evolved into something that the user is in control, not the app author.
5 per cent? I have to admit that I was relieved when I read that.
Had I been asked to guess I would have thought it was rather more. However, their sample size (some 300 k or so) is reassuringly trustworthy as far as statistical confidence is concerned so I am inclined to take it on face value.
Their hand in your pocket.
I guess what makes mobile malware so sinister is that it could so easily be used to run up costs on your phone account. This is a different order of threat than annoyances on your PC.