Feeds

AMD smacked by channel slump in Q2

Nearly 10 per cent drop

Website security in corporate America

The bean counters at AMD have done a first pass on the company's second quarter, and it is not looking so good.

The company said in a statement after Wall Street called it a day on Monday that revenues in the second quarter ended in June would fall by approximately 11 per cent sequentially from the first quarter.

AMD had previously told investors that sales would be somewhere between flat and up 6 per cent from the first quarter's sales, which hit $1.59bn and which declined by 1.7 per cent compared to the first quarter of 2011. (Technically, AMD said that it expected for overall sales to be up 3 per cent, plus or minus 3 per cent.)

"The lower preliminary revenue results are primarily due to business conditions that materialized late in the second quarter," AMD said in the statement, "specifically softer-than-expected channel sales in China and Europe as well as a weaker consumer buying environment impacting the company's Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) business."

In the second quarter of 2011, AMD had $1.57bn in sales, down 5 per cent year-on-year, and a net income of $61m, much better than the $43m loss it had in the prior year. That 11 per cent sequential decrease puts revenues in Q2 2012 at around $1.41bn, which works out to a 9.9 per cent year-on-year decrease. The revenue drop, in terms of percentages against last year's figures, is accelerating as 2012 goes on.

The good news for AMD is that gross margins are anticipated to be in the same range as was expected with the higher revenues, and that due to tightly controlled spending, operating expenses are about 8 per cent lower than the expected $605m that had been planned. That's about $48m in lower expenses, and that could mean the bottom line doesn't take so much of a hit.

AMD did not talk about whether it would turn a profit in the quarter, and said only that more details about Q2 would be revealed during its conference call with analysts after the market closes on July 19. ®

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.