Feeds

Now Apple faces Siri court room showdown

Patent dispute could cost more than Proview pay-out

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Apple’s protracted iPad trademark battle with Proview appears to have opened the floodgates to further legal attacks in China, with Siri now being targeted in a law suit which could cost Cupertino in excess of $60 million to resolve.

A Shanghai-based developer of voice assistant technology has filed against Apple and its local subsidiary Apple Computer Trading alleging Siri infringes one of its patents.

Zhizhen Network Technology had a patent for "a type of instant messaging chat bot system" called Xiaoi Bot approved in China in early 2006, according to China Business News (via Marbridge Daily).

The Shanghai tech developer apparently sent Apple a notice in May trying to resolve the dispute but received no response from the fruity toy maker. A Shanghai court is now preparing to hear the case.

A Zhizhen representative told China Business News that if the court finds in its favour or if Apple agrees to a settlement, it will probably exceed the $60m it ended up paying failed monitor biz Proview in its long-running trademark battle.

Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Cupertino is also under legal fire from another Chinese firm - Jiangsu Snow Leopard Household Chemical – over trademark rights to use the Snow Leopard name.

The firm wants 500,000 yuan (£50,000) in damages and a public apology from Apple, claiming the tech giant used the name to market and sell its now outdated OS despite Jiangsu having already registered 42 trademarks relating to its Chinese translation, xuebao.

However, the Siri case may prove a little more urgent for Apple, given that it recently announced Mandarin and Cantonese support for the voice assistant at this year's WWDC.

Although reception to the tool has so far been muted, any legal complications delaying its roll-out would be most unwelcome as Cupertino looks to redouble its efforts on the huge and lucrative Chinese market. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.