EU rejects Oracle secondhand software licence grab
Oracle internet argument rebuffed
Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything
An attempt by Oracle to stop the sale of secondhand licences on software downloaded over the internet was rejected today by the community's highest court.
The court's ruling hinges on the EU
directive on the legal protection OF
of computer programs.
Image by Dimitar Nikolov
In its judgment today, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that the author of software "cannot oppose the resale of his ‘used’ licences allowing the use of his programs downloaded from the internet. The exclusive right of distribution of a copy of a computer program covered by such a licence is exhausted on its first sale".
The ruling comes in proceedings brought by Oracle against a German company called UsedSoft, which, in contravention of licence agreements, resold licences acquired from Oracle customers. Oracle gives the customer a "non-transferable user right for an unlimited period, exclusively for his internal business purpose," The Court of Justice writes.
The court's ruling hinges on the EU directive on the legal protection of computer programs, which introduces the principle of exhaustion of distribution right after first sale. Oracle argued that this does not apply to user licences downloaded from the internet.
The Court rejected this claim, judging that the principle of exhaustion holds good for downloads as well as for copies distributed by CD-ROM or DVD. As with physical media, the owners of downloaded software must destroy their copies after selling to a third party, the Court ruled. Also, owners are not allowed to split multi-seat licences for resale in smaller units
This is a sensible judgment, but does not have major ramifications for the software industry. The Court is merely reinforcing the right to sell secondhand software licences within the EU. ®
COMMENTS
"This is a sensible judgment, but does not have major ramifications for the software industry."
Ho ho. This is a sensible judgement *because* the alternative would have major ramifications for the software industry. Surely?
Re: It might have ramifications.
While I agree that "I doubt this ruling extends to forcing suppliers to create mechanisms to allow resale of their goods"; I expect that putting something in place to stop software being resold would be forbidden. No doubt that this will go through a few more court rounds before we see any major change. I tried to give a friend my used copy of Assasins Creed II, however restrictions were put in place by the publisher to stop him being able to use it. This situation must change.
Re: Books......
"do not lend, borrow, sell' gubbins in the front of books,"
The do not lend, borrow, sell gubbins refers to "in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published" or words to that effect. ie you are not stopped from selling or lending the book so long as you don't "re-package" it by using a new/different dust jacket or re-binding it with a new cover.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
