The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple lobs pocket change to Proview, ending Chinese IPAD name row

$60m? Hardly worth opening our wallet to get it out

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Apple has forked out $60m to settle the row over the name IPAD with Chinese firm Proview Technology.

The fruity firm agreed to the sum to buy the name from Proview in mediation talks, the Higher People's Court of Guangdong said in a statement (translated by Google Translate).

"All parties involved have agreed on the settlement. Proview and Apple now no longer have a dispute over the iPad trademark," Xie Xianghui, a lawyer for Proview, told state news agency Xinhua.

Proview, a maker of computer screens and LED lights based in Shenzhen, had been trying to block sales of iPads on the Chinese mainland, claiming that although Apple had bought the trademark for the name in some countries, it didn't own the name in China.

Apple alleged that it had bought the international trademark, which gave it the name everywhere, including China.

Proview Shenzhen was declared bankrupt during the case, after it failed to recover from hits it took in the financial crisis.

The court's statement acknowledged that the firm was heavily in debt and the IPAD trademark was the most valuable thing it owned.

The dispute between the firms went to the Guangdong higher court after Proview won the case in a lower court in December last year.

Almost from the outset, Guangdong urged the firms to settle the row out of court, but reports had suggested there was a wide gap in the amount of money each side wanted to talk about.

Just to put the settlement figure in perspective, it's worth bearing in mind that Apple made a net profit of $13.06bn in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 alone, so $60m is not going to break the firm's piggy-bank.

The lawsuit's end frees Apple up to focus on pushing endless iterations of its fondleslabs on China's tech-savvy and fashion-conscious youth, bound to be worth the price it paid and a whole lot more.

Apple had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication. ®

What you need to know about cloud backup

Anonymous Coward

Not guilty...

Not guilty, not a fine, not mediation. Other than that, correct on all counts.

6
0

Obligatory

A piffling sixty million? Pay the fellow, Edmund, and damn his impudence!

4
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Don't understand

Proview were on the brink of going under, now they will survive and their business model may be to keep suing people to get more money.

Surely not, Apple have a patent on suing people.

8
4

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
 breaking news
Ecuador: All right, Julian, you CAN stay on our sofa - it's your human right
Minister and Wikileaker share cosy chat in tiny London flat
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights