Oracle accepts a nice round number in damages from Google
Let's get this over with so we can appeal already
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Oracle has agreed to accept damages of $0 from Google in the Java case for the small bit of copyright infringement of which the judge found it guilty.
Judge William Alsup cleared the Chocolate Factory of most of Oracle's infringement claims last month and ruled that Google had copied only a few small bits of Java code. Oracle and Google met in court yesterday to decide what damages Google should pay, where their lawyers announced the firms had settled on $0.
It sounds a bit like Oracle has taken leave of its senses, but it's more likely that the firm just wants this trial over so that it can appeal and try to get Alsup's earlier decisions overturned.
Google has also signalled that it might look for legal fees from Oracle, since it basically won on most counts.
It all went horribly wrong for Oracle at the end of last month when Judge Alsup ruled that APIs can't be copyrighted, effectively killing Oracle's suit.
"So long as the specific code used to implement a method is different, anyone is free under the Copyright Act to write his or her own code to carry out exactly the same function or specification of any methods used in the Java API," he said.
The previous week, Google got off the hook on patent infringement when the jury ruled that neither of the two patents left to be claimed by Oracle had been infringed by the Android operating system.
Oracle was originally hoping for as much as $1bn from the patent part of the suit and a cool $6bn on copyright infringement, so $0 isn't really going to cut it.
Dragging out the arguments about the amount of damages would just waste Oracle's time though, since it's not going to get anywhere near what it wants from the small amount of copyright infringement in the ruling. Tidying things up at this stage will speed the firm onward to its appeal.
Google now has two weeks to file for legal fees if it wants to, a request that Oracle can contest. ®
COMMENTS
Serves Oracle right
Google didn't sign a contract with Oracle, didn't pass off Android as Java, didn't use any Sun / Oracle code aside from one small snippet and didn't infringe on any patents of note (certainly not tried in a court).
It amazes me it was taken this far. I think it would have been more productive for Oracle to work with Google, to cross licence stuff such as folding Dalvik work back into J2ME in exchange for JavaFX going into Android and so on. That might have worked out quite favourably for everyone concerned. As it is Oracle gets nothing but a large legal bill and Android steamrollers on.
No fair switching the units!
You could at least report that they won £0bn, like the other figures.
Re: Not going to be overturned.
IBM still is king
(I have to say that, they pay my wages)

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist