The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Vendors have second stab at smart TV standard

Set to die screening?

Major TV manufacturers are making another stab at persuading their competitors to jointly develop and support a standard platform for smart TV apps.

LG and TP Vision today announced the formation of the Smart TV Alliance, a re-branded version of the partnership announced by LG, Philips and Sharp back in September 2011 at the IFA show.

Back then, the trio's goal was to create a smart TV apps platform based on open standards - it uses HTML 5, CE-HTML, HbbTV and others - to publish the SDK and get other TV makers to back it. The SDK was duly released, but they have failed to attract broader support.

Smart TV Alliance logo

But while LG remains committed to the project, original participant Sharp's name was notably absent from today's announcement, though reference was made to "other Japanese TV manufacturers in the process of joining".

Philips' circumstances have changed since in the intervening nine months too. Back then it made and sold televisions; now it doesn't. In April 2012, it quit the market and licensed its name to Asian screen maker TPV Technology, the company behind brands like AOC and Envision. The two formed a joint-venture, TP Vision. to market Philips-branded tellies. Philips has a 30 per cent stake.

TP Vision is still backing the LG initiative, but until there's solid backing from others the Alliance's efforts to become a standard seem unlikely to pay off.

The benefits are clear: app makers can write one version of their code and have it run on a range of sets. But until the Smart TV Alliance standard becomes more widely supported, they'll still have to write separate apps for Sony Bravias, Samsungs, Toshiba Regzas, Panasonic Vieras and so on.

Worse, there's a 'cake and eat it too' element to the Smart TV Alliance specification. Today's announcement also highlighted the work being done on SDK 2.0, due out by the end of the year and which developers "will be able to create applications for 2013 TV sets from participating Alliance members".

Yes, 2013 sets - but not necessarily 2012 sets. The nature of the core components means there will be some backward compatibility, but don't bank on it, the Alliance's announcement seems to suggest.

We've already seen how, for example, Sony has made a Netflix app available for its latest Bravia TVs, but flipped a finger to any customer with the audacity to own a Sony-branded smart TV from previous years.

And that's the problem: will smart TV technology ever take off when television makers, even those promoting multi-vendor standards, insist on minimising the compatibility between one year's TVs and the the next. ®

Anonymous Coward

My TV is dumb

I connect smart things to it

Those smart things can be upgraded

divide and conquer wins again with Tech

6
0

"And that's the problem: will smart TV technology ever take off when television makers, even those promoting multi-vendor standards, insist on minimising the compatibility between one year's TVs and the the next"

Simple answer - no.

TVs are not high churn items and users expect them to last a while. The ongoing digital changeover is the only reason they have had to upgrade their televisions for a long time and even with this change, many users are just purchasing a digital set to box and plugging this into their existing television. The move from CRT to flat panel (mainly LCD) is not a forced change but one that is seen as desirable especially now they are commodity items and ever supermarket possible is offloading cheap me-too but perfectly adequate quality systems for low prices. A large percentage of these users also took the opportunity at the same time to switch to High Definition now the standards have settled a bit and the rampant stitch-up of early adopters has passed.

As for consumer satisfaction with smart TVs - from personal experience I don't know of any, especially non-technical, user that is happy with them. This dissatisfaction is either down to awful EPGs and interfaces riddled with adverts, many models missing features such as iPlayer, c4Player and other popular catch up services, through to unstable or just slow to start systems.

4
0

Please just give us decent open standards

Like most people, I increasingly want online content rather than broadcast (satellite or Freeview), and the current offering and options just doesn't provide what I need.

An open standard for delivering content (e.g. hbbTV) would be great - for example, the iPlayer app on my 2011 Bravia is utter pants compared to the web app, and LoveFilm on the Bravia is okay but nothing like as good as on the PS3. So if an open standard makes it easier for broadcasters/content providers to provide their content and make sure that the UI and user experience is top-notch then that would be fabulous.

However, the one thing that always strikes me is that right now I'm just not in control of what content is available through my TV - I get the online services that Sony deems I should get. Frankly, I don't give a monkey's what Sony think - I want to be able to add any service that I want. It might be e.g. a German or French TV station, Netflix, a future alternative to that, or a future ElReg channel. Irrespective, I want to be in control of available channels/services and that's just not possible right now.

If that can be done through HbbTV then that would be amazing. Ultimately, I just want to be able to add my own chosen repo of broadcaster information (like with XBMC) or enter a custom URL for a chosen broadcaster. With that, it could be fantastic.

Beyond that, full HTML5 rendering must surely go a long way to delivering everything presently required.

Anyway, in the same way as I bought my Humax satellite box, I'll probably buy a set top box which stands a chance of getting custom firmware.

2
0

Fat chance

They could not even standardize remotes.

2
0

Completely agree.

I've been interested in a "smart" TV for a while now, and after seeing the lack of support for early models I will instead be using a standalone box to provide the smart functionality I require. At the moment the Raspberry PI with Raspbmc seems to be my cheapest bet, but I reckon what with rumours of Apple entering the market and the possible launch of GoogleTV in the UK there might be some progress on inexpensive updatable standalone smart TV boxes in the near future.

Now all I need is a box that will stream Freeview over IP and I can ditch my cable. Alas my Freeview reception isn't quite good enough to do so yet.

1
0

More from The Register

New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
Report: AT&T dropping Facebook phone after dismal sales
Turns out folks won't buy that for a dollar
Nintendo throws flaming legal barrel at YouTubing fans
All your walk-through vid revenue are belong to us
Which petite model likes a fondle and GETTING WET? Sony's Xperia ZR
Take this new mobe swimming. Just not deep, or for long, OK?